Department of Neurosciences, Ophthalmology and Genetics, University of Genoa, Italy.
Eye (Lond). 2009 Feb;23(2):407-12. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6703013. Epub 2007 Nov 9.
To verify whether scanning laser polarimeter with the new variable corneal compensation algorithm (GDx VCC) and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT)) allow measuring retinal ganglion cell loss in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).
We enrolled 23 MS patients with a history of previous demyelinating monocular optic neuritis. Examination included visual evoked potentials (VEPs), scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, and scanning laser polarimeter. HRT was performed to assess optic nerve head (ONH) shape, while GDx VCC was used to evaluate the retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (RNFLt) around the ONH. Statistical analysis was performed comparing results obtained for each eye with the available normative database and with the unaffected fellow eye.
When the affected eye group was compared to the fellow-eye group, a significant (P<0.05) difference was found for few GDx VCC parameters. In contrast, no significant correlation was observed between clinical assessment and imaging techniques when the normal database of HRT and GDx VCC was used. A significant association was observed between VEP latency and some GDx VCC parameters.
Our results suggested that scanning laser polarimetry could detect loss of ganglion cells following demyelinating optic neuritis, but further studies are needed.
验证新型可变角膜补偿算法(GDx VCC)扫描激光偏振仪和扫描激光检眼镜(海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪(HRT))是否可用于测量多发性硬化症(MS)患者的视网膜神经节细胞损失。
我们招募了 23 名有既往脱髓鞘性单眼视神经炎病史的 MS 患者。检查包括视觉诱发电位(VEPs)、扫描激光检眼镜和扫描激光偏振仪。HRT 用于评估视神经头(ONH)形状,而 GDx VCC 用于评估 ONH 周围的视网膜神经纤维层厚度(RNFLt)。对每只眼的结果与可用的正常数据库和未受影响的对侧眼进行比较,并进行统计学分析。
当受影响的眼组与对侧眼组进行比较时,发现 GDx VCC 的几个参数存在显著差异(P<0.05)。相比之下,当使用 HRT 和 GDx VCC 的正常数据库时,临床评估与影像学技术之间没有观察到显著相关性。VEP 潜伏期与一些 GDx VCC 参数之间存在显著相关性。
我们的结果表明,扫描激光偏振仪可以检测脱髓鞘性视神经炎后神经节细胞的损失,但需要进一步研究。