Yurevich Andrey
Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Yaroslavskaya 13, Moscow, Russia.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2007 Mar;41(1):21-7; discussion 75-82. doi: 10.1007/s12124-007-9001-3.
The author presents several arguments against Toomela's (Culture of science: Strange history of the methodological thinking in psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 2007a, doi:10.1007/sl2124-007-9004-0, History of methodology in psychology: Starting point, not the goal. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 2007b, doi:10.1007/sl2124-007-9005-z) pessimistic thesis: "The last 60 years of research in psychology seems to have gone astray." Nevertheless he admits that Toomela's article despite the excessively categorical assessments contained in it and the undue pessimism crowing its conclusion, represents a substantial contribution to the highlighting of socio-cultural impact on various models of psychological cognition, which lurks behind the international unification of globalizing science.
作者提出了几个反对图梅拉(《科学文化:心理学方法论思维的奇特历史》,《综合心理与行为科学》,2007年a卷,doi:10.1007/sl2124-007-9004-0;《心理学方法论史:起点,而非目标》,《综合心理与行为科学》,2007年b卷,doi:10.1007/sl2124-007-9005-z)悲观论点的论据:“心理学过去60年的研究似乎走入了歧途。”然而,他承认,尽管图梅拉的文章存在过于绝对的评价以及结论中过度的悲观情绪,但它对凸显社会文化对各种心理认知模型的影响做出了重大贡献,而这种影响潜藏在全球化科学的国际统一背后。