Sato Tatsuya, Watanabe Yoshiyuki, Omi Yasuhiro
Department of Psychology, Ritsumeikan University, Kyoto, Japan.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2007 Mar;41(1):50-9; discussion 75-82. doi: 10.1007/s12124-007-9009-8.
There are two ways for overcoming limitations of methods used in psychology, as Toomela (Integr. Physiol. Behav. Sci. doi:10.1007/s12124-007-9004-0, 2007) points out. These are inventing new methods of research, and looking back into the history of methodological thought for new ideas. Though he limited the former as if it is a quantitative area and he declared to take the latter path, his paper actually advocates the need to create new methodology for understanding the human psyche through historical approach. We discuss problems of sampling and generalization in that context, and suggest a new way to creative synthesis through elaboration of qualitative methodologies. To us this direction constitutes an updated version of the German-Austrian methodology exactly as Toomela suggests.
正如托梅拉(《综合生理学与行为科学》,doi:10.1007/s12124-007-9004-0,2007年)所指出的,有两种方法可以克服心理学中所用方法的局限性。这两种方法分别是发明新的研究方法,以及回顾方法论思想的历史以获取新的思路。尽管他将前者限定为似乎是一个定量领域,并宣称要走后者的道路,但他的论文实际上主张有必要通过历史方法来创建理解人类心理的新方法论。我们在这种背景下讨论抽样和概括的问题,并通过阐述定性方法提出一种创造性综合的新途径。对我们来说,正如托梅拉所建议的,这个方向构成了德奥方法论的更新版本。