Godderis L, Deschuyffeleer T, Roelandt H, Veulemans H, Moens G
IDEWE, External Service for Prevention and Protection at Work, Interleuvenlaan 58, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008 Jul;81(7):845-53. doi: 10.1007/s00420-007-0275-z. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
Metal working fluids (MWF) are used during the machining or treatment of metal components as aluminium. The study of adverse health effects of exposure to MWF is very important because the potentially exposed population is large. In this study, we evaluated 31 workers of three departments (Extrusion, Hot and Cold Rolling Mill) in a secondary aluminium plant.
We combined exposure assessment to MWF and their biodegradation products (aldehydes, etc.) with biomonitoring 1-OH-pyrene in the urine and an evaluation of respiratory and dermatological complaints by using the Saint-George's respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ) and Dalgard's skin questionnaire.
We only detected MWF vapour levels of 4.1 and 5.5 mg/m3 at the Cold Rolling Mills. Only very small traces of solvents, organic acids and carbon-gasses were identified in all work environments. Several aldehydes were measured in low concentrations, e.g. formaldehyde at 0.03 mg/m3. 1-OH-pyrene levels were all around the detection limit of 0.2 microg/l. The scores of the Extrusion department were all within normal values as defined in the manual of the SGRQ. In contrast, the Hot and Cold Rolling Mill were scoring significantly above the score of a population without respiratory health problems. Moreover, the participants of the Hot and Cold Rolling Mill displayed a Dalgard's Skin score = 1.3 indicating that these individuals have an increased risk of developing skin diseases
We recommend measuring oil vapour, additives and contaminants in addition to oil mist only for assessing exposure to MWF. We also found indications that exposure to MWF vapours and emulsified MWF might lead to respiratory and skin problems, but a bigger epidemiological study in exposed workers will be necessary to make more definitive conclusions.
金属加工液(MWF)在铝等金属部件的加工或处理过程中使用。由于潜在暴露人群庞大,研究暴露于MWF的健康不良影响非常重要。在本研究中,我们评估了一家再生铝厂三个部门(挤压、热轧和冷轧厂)的31名工人。
我们将对MWF及其生物降解产物(醛等)的暴露评估与尿中1-羟基芘的生物监测以及使用圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)和达尔加德皮肤问卷对呼吸和皮肤不适的评估相结合。
我们仅在冷轧厂检测到MWF蒸汽水平分别为4.1和5.5毫克/立方米。在所有工作环境中仅鉴定出极少量的溶剂、有机酸和碳气体。检测到几种醛类浓度较低,例如甲醛为0.03毫克/立方米。1-羟基芘水平均在0.2微克/升的检测限左右。挤压部门的得分均在SGRQ手册中定义的正常值范围内。相比之下,热轧厂和冷轧厂的得分明显高于无呼吸健康问题人群的得分。此外,热轧厂和冷轧厂的参与者达尔加德皮肤评分为1.3,表明这些个体患皮肤病的风险增加。
我们建议除了油雾外,还应测量油蒸汽、添加剂和污染物,以评估对MWF的暴露。我们还发现有迹象表明,暴露于MWF蒸汽和乳化MWF可能会导致呼吸和皮肤问题,但需要对暴露工人进行更大规模的流行病学研究才能得出更明确的结论。