• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童在医疗保健中的决策能力综述。

A review of children's decision-making competence in health care.

作者信息

Mårtenson Eva K, Fägerskiöld Astrid M

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2008 Dec;17(23):3131-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01920.x. Epub 2007 Nov 14.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01920.x
PMID:18005126
Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this literature review was to search for and review, systematically, children's decision-making competence in health care in the scientific literature. Findings of both quantitative and qualitative studies were analysed thematically.

BACKGROUND

Most previous research in children's decision-making competence in health care concerns adults' care in the best interests of the child. It is important to consider decision-making competence from the child's perspective because of children's own human rights.

METHODS

Systematic review including database search, manual selection, supplementary searching, management and acquisition of relevant literature, quality appraisal, literature review saturation and thematic review.

RESULTS

Six themes emerged: measurable issues, values and beliefs, power, parent-related communication, trust and self-determination. Measurable issues were age, reading ability and memory. Values and beliefs as well as power and parent-related communication were associated with healthcare professionals. Children showed trust and expressed a wish to use self-determination.

CONCLUSIONS

Age appropriate information and participation were prerequisites for allowing children to have possibilities of making competent decisions about their own care. Children's decision-making competence is dependent on others, such as parents and healthcare professionals, attitudes and not only on their own capacity. Lack of competence, however, does not exclude children from the human right to have a say. It should be noted that it is a decision to leave the determination to a parent or healthcare professional.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Future research from the viewpoint of children is important to reach optimal levels of participation, through respecting their integrity and to develop them into potential competent decision makers.

摘要

目的与目标

本综述的目的是系统检索并回顾科学文献中儿童在医疗保健方面的决策能力。对定量和定性研究的结果进行了主题分析。

背景

以往关于儿童在医疗保健方面决策能力的大多数研究都关注从儿童最大利益出发的成人护理。由于儿童自身的人权,从儿童的角度考虑决策能力很重要。

方法

系统综述,包括数据库检索、人工筛选、补充检索、相关文献的管理与获取、质量评估、文献综述饱和度和主题综述。

结果

出现了六个主题:可衡量的问题、价值观和信念、权力、与父母相关的沟通、信任和自决。可衡量的问题包括年龄、阅读能力和记忆力。价值观和信念以及权力和与父母相关的沟通与医疗保健专业人员有关。儿童表现出信任并表达了使用自决的愿望。

结论

适合年龄的信息和参与是让儿童有可能就自己的护理做出明智决策的先决条件。儿童的决策能力不仅取决于他们自身的能力,还取决于他人,如父母和医疗保健专业人员的态度。然而,能力不足并不排除儿童拥有发言权的人权。应该注意的是,这是一个将决定权留给父母或医疗保健专业人员的决定。

与临床实践的相关性

从儿童的角度进行未来研究对于通过尊重他们的完整性并将他们培养成为潜在的明智决策者来达到最佳参与水平很重要。

相似文献

1
A review of children's decision-making competence in health care.儿童在医疗保健中的决策能力综述。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Dec;17(23):3131-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01920.x. Epub 2007 Nov 14.
2
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
5
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
6
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
7
Patient experiences of partnering with healthcare professionals for hand hygiene compliance: a systematic review.患者与医护人员合作以确保手部卫生合规的经历:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Jun;15(6):1645-1670. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003001.
8
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
9
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics of child development in the context of serious illness: a scoping review.重症背景下儿童发育的特征:一项范围综述
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 May 9;24(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01751-0.
2
Capacity to consent: a scoping review of youth decision-making capacity for gender-affirming care.同意能力:性别肯定护理中青少年决策能力的范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Oct 8;25(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01107-y.
3
Perspectives on the essential skills of healthcare decision making in children and adolescents with intellectual disability.
关注智障儿童和青少年医疗决策的基本技能。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Jun 7;23(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02204-5.
4
Young people's and adults' views and experiences of decision-making to manage compromised first permanent molars: a qualitative study.年轻人和成年人对处理受损第一恒磨牙决策的看法和经历:一项定性研究
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2025 Jan;35(1):165-175. doi: 10.1111/ipd.13217. Epub 2024 May 27.
5
Triadic communication with teenagers and young adults with cancer: a systematic literature review - 'make me feel like I'm not the third person'.与癌症青少年和年轻人的三方沟通:系统文献回顾——“让我觉得自己不是第三个人”。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 17;14(2):e080024. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080024.
6
It hurts to get forced: Children's narratives about restraint during medical procedures.被迫的滋味不好受:儿童关于医疗程序中约束的叙述。
Paediatr Neonatal Pain. 2023 Feb 2;5(4):110-118. doi: 10.1002/pne2.12093. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Biobanking and consenting to research: a qualitative thematic analysis of young people's perspectives in the North East of England.生物库与研究同意:英格兰东北部年轻人观点的定性主题分析。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Jul 5;24(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00925-w.
8
Maternal Perceptions of Safeguards for Research Involving Children.母亲对涉及儿童研究保障措施的看法。
J Child Fam Stud. 2022 May;31(5):1220-1231. doi: 10.1007/s10826-021-02037-8. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
9
Dental health care for children with Down syndrome: Parents' description of their children's needs in dental health care settings.唐氏综合征儿童的口腔保健:家长对其在口腔保健环境中需求的描述。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2022 Jun;130(3):e12859. doi: 10.1111/eos.12859. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
10
Children's Understanding of Informed Assents in Research Studies.儿童对研究中知情同意的理解。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jul 10;9(7):871. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9070871.