• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者与医疗保健专业人员对药物遗传学检测及其在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中的未来应用的看法。

Patients' and healthcare professionals' views on pharmacogenetic testing and its future delivery in the NHS.

作者信息

Fargher Emily A, Eddy Charlotte, Newman William, Qasim Faieza, Tricker Karen, Elliott Rachel A, Payne Katherine

机构信息

Nowgen - A Centre for Genetics in Healthcare, The Nowgen Centre, 29 Grafton Street, Manchester M13 9WU, UK.

出版信息

Pharmacogenomics. 2007 Nov;8(11):1511-9. doi: 10.2217/14622416.8.11.1511.

DOI:10.2217/14622416.8.11.1511
PMID:18034616
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is limited empirical evidence on patients' and healthcare professionals' views on the provision of pharmacogenetic testing services. These opinions may be used to shape the development of emerging pharmacogenetic services and inform healthcare professionals' future educational requirements.

OBJECTIVES

To explore patients' and healthcare professionals' views about pharmacogenetic testing services and their future development.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients who had been prescribed azathioprine for autoimmune conditions and prevention of acute rejection in renal transplantation. Focus groups were conducted with a range of healthcare professionals. Interviews and focus groups were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using the constant comparative method.

RESULTS

The views of 42 individuals - 25 patients and 17 healthcare professionals - were explored in depth. Key themes emerging from the data were: patients' and healthcare professionals' knowledge and experience of pharmacogenetics; expectations about how such a testing service could be used; and characteristics of service delivery. Knowledge and experience of pharmacogenetics varied. Pharmacogenetics was perceived to be of benefit by both groups. Patients gave opinions about pharmacogenetic services based on their experiences of illness, taking medicines and using healthcare services. Healthcare professionals based their opinions on how existing services are provided and access to limited healthcare resources. Patients had strong feelings about how this service should be delivered and expected high standards of explanation about potential pharmacogenetic tests. None of the healthcare professionals questioned expected to have responsibility for the future delivery of pharmacogenetic testing services.

CONCLUSION

There is no clear model of how pharmacogenetic tests will be delivered in clinical practice. Patients expect to receive pharmacogenetic services from healthcare professionals who are able to explain the test, and interpret the implications for prescribing, with confidence. The gap between patients' high expectations for information and healthcare professionals' current knowledge and reluctance to deliver pharmacogenetic services highlights the urgent need for better education and training of healthcare professionals in pharmacogenetics.

摘要

引言

关于患者和医疗保健专业人员对药物遗传学检测服务提供的看法,实证证据有限。这些意见可用于塑造新兴药物遗传学服务的发展,并为医疗保健专业人员未来的教育需求提供参考。

目的

探讨患者和医疗保健专业人员对药物遗传学检测服务及其未来发展的看法。

方法

对因自身免疫性疾病或预防肾移植急性排斥反应而服用硫唑嘌呤的患者进行了半结构化访谈。对一系列医疗保健专业人员进行了焦点小组讨论。访谈和焦点小组讨论均进行了录音,并逐字转录。使用持续比较法对数据进行了分析。

结果

深入探讨了42个人的观点,其中包括25名患者和17名医疗保健专业人员。数据中出现的关键主题包括:患者和医疗保健专业人员对药物遗传学的知识和经验;对如何使用此类检测服务的期望;以及服务提供的特点。对药物遗传学的知识和经验各不相同。两组都认为药物遗传学有益。患者根据他们的疾病经历、服药情况和使用医疗服务的情况对药物遗传学服务发表了意见。医疗保健专业人员的意见基于现有服务的提供方式和获得有限医疗资源的情况。患者对该服务的提供方式有强烈的感受,并期望对潜在的药物遗传学检测有高标准的解释。预计没有一名接受询问的医疗保健专业人员会对未来药物遗传学检测服务的提供负责。

结论

在临床实践中,尚无明确的药物遗传学检测提供模式。患者期望从能够自信地解释检测结果并解读其对处方影响的医疗保健专业人员那里获得药物遗传学服务。患者对信息的高期望与医疗保健专业人员目前的知识以及提供药物遗传学服务的不情愿之间的差距,凸显了对医疗保健专业人员进行更好的药物遗传学教育和培训的迫切需求。

相似文献

1
Patients' and healthcare professionals' views on pharmacogenetic testing and its future delivery in the NHS.患者与医疗保健专业人员对药物遗传学检测及其在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中的未来应用的看法。
Pharmacogenomics. 2007 Nov;8(11):1511-9. doi: 10.2217/14622416.8.11.1511.
2
Comparison of health care professionals' self-assessments of standards of care and patients' opinions on the care they received in hospital: observational study.医疗保健专业人员对护理标准的自我评估与患者对其住院期间所接受护理的看法比较:观察性研究。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Jun;13(3):198-202. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.3.198.
3
Valuing pharmacogenetic testing services: a comparison of patients' and health care professionals' preferences.评估药物遗传学检测服务:患者和医疗保健专业人员偏好的比较。
Value Health. 2011 Jan;14(1):121-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.10.007.
4
Assessment of healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitudes, and perceived challenges of clinical pharmacogenetic testing in Egypt.埃及医疗保健专业人员对临床药物遗传学检测的知识、态度及感知挑战的评估。
Per Med. 2020 Jul 1;17(4):251-260. doi: 10.2217/pme-2019-0163. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
5
Perspectives on eating disorders and service provision: A qualitative study of healthcare professionals.进食障碍及服务提供相关观点:医疗保健专业人员的定性研究。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2010 Sep-Oct;18(5):390-8. doi: 10.1002/erv.976.
6
An exploration of health professionals' experiences of medicines management in elderly, hospitalised patients in Abu Dhabi.对阿布扎比老年住院患者用药管理中医师经历的探索。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Feb;38(1):107-18. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0212-2.
7
Professionals' views on mental health service users' education: challenges and support.专业人士对精神卫生服务使用者教育的看法:挑战与支持
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Feb;24(1):57-68. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12355.
8
Why don't healthcare professionals talk about sex? A systematic review of recent qualitative studies conducted in the United kingdom.为什么医疗保健专业人员不谈论性?对英国近期开展的定性研究的系统评价。
J Sex Med. 2013 Nov;10(11):2658-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02856.x. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
9
The influence of organisational climate on care of patients with schizophrenia: a qualitative analysis of health care professionals' views.组织氛围对精神分裂症患者护理的影响:对医护人员观点的定性分析
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Apr;38(2):344-52. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0247-z. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
10
Difficult decisions: An interpretative phenomenological analysis study of healthcare professionals' perceptions of oxygen therapy in palliative care.艰难的决策:一项关于医护人员对姑息治疗中氧疗认知的解释性现象学分析研究
Palliat Med. 2015 Dec;29(10):950-8. doi: 10.1177/0269216315584864. Epub 2015 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of consumers' knowledge, attitudes and experiences of primary health professionals' role in genomic medicine.对消费者关于初级卫生专业人员在基因组医学中作用的知识、态度和经历的系统评价。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1038/s41431-025-01904-y.
2
Knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of the multi-ethnic population of the United Arab Emirates on genomic medicine and genetic testing.阿联酋多民族人口对基因组医学和基因检测的知识、态度和看法。
Hum Genomics. 2023 Jul 15;17(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s40246-023-00509-0.
3
Preferences for pharmacogenomic testing in polypharmacy patients: a discrete choice experiment.
多药治疗患者对药物基因组检测的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Per Med. 2022 Nov;19(6):535-548. doi: 10.2217/pme-2022-0056. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
4
Public Attitudes toward Pharmacogenomic Testing and Establishing a Statewide Pharmacogenomics Database in the State of Minnesota.明尼苏达州公众对药物基因组检测及建立全州药物基因组数据库的态度。
J Pers Med. 2022 Sep 30;12(10):1615. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101615.
5
Pharmacogenomics in Children.儿童药物基因组学
Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2547:569-593. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2573-6_20.
6
Clinical Pharmacists' Knowledge of and Attitudes toward Pharmacogenomic Testing in China.中国临床药师对药物基因组学检测的了解与态度
J Pers Med. 2022 Aug 21;12(8):1348. doi: 10.3390/jpm12081348.
7
Clinical Pharmacists' Involvement in Pharmacogenomics Testing and Related Services in China.中国临床药师参与药物基因组学检测及相关服务情况
J Pers Med. 2022 Jul 31;12(8):1267. doi: 10.3390/jpm12081267.
8
Pharmacogenomic testing to support prescribing in primary care: a structured review of implementation models.药物基因组学检测在初级保健中的应用:实施模式的系统评价。
Pharmacogenomics. 2021 Aug;22(12):761-776. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2021-0032. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
9
Pharmacogenomics for Primary Care: An Overview.基层医疗中的药物基因组学:概述
Genes (Basel). 2020 Nov 12;11(11):1337. doi: 10.3390/genes11111337.
10
Reporting Formative Qualitative Research to Support the Development of Quantitative Preference Study Protocols and Corresponding Survey Instruments: Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers.报告形成性定性研究以支持定量偏好研究方案和相应调查工具的制定:作者和审稿人的指南。
Patient. 2020 Feb;13(1):121-136. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00401-x.