van der Meulen Nienke, Jansen Jesse, van Dulmen Sandra, Bensing Jozien, van Weert Julia
NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Psychooncology. 2008 Sep;17(9):857-68. doi: 10.1002/pon.1290.
This systematic review investigates which interventions are effective to improve recall of medical information in cancer patients. A literature research was done in PubMed, PsychINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane Library, following the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration. The methodological quality of selected studies was assessed independently by two reviewers. The results were synthesized with a Best Evidence Synthesis. Of initially 5173 found publications, 10 met all selection criteria. The results indicate that an audiotape of the patients' own consultation has added value upon oral information only. However, providing patients with a general audiotape does not improve recall of information and might even inhibit patients' recall. Furthermore, there is scientific evidence, although limited, that the use of a question prompt sheet (QPS) has a positive effect on recall of information, provided that the physician actively endorses this sheet. No evidence was found for an effect of providing patients with a summary letter of the consultation on recall, although research on this subject is scarce. In conclusion, the review suggests that interventions that are tailored to the individual cancer patient, such as an audiotape of the consultation or a QPS, are most effective. Further research needs to be done to establish robust results.
本系统评价旨在探究哪些干预措施能有效提高癌症患者对医学信息的记忆。按照Cochrane协作网的指南,在PubMed、PsychINFO、CINAHL和Cochrane图书馆进行了文献检索。由两名评价员独立评估所选研究的方法学质量。采用最佳证据综合法对结果进行综合分析。在最初检索到的5173篇文献中,有10篇符合所有纳入标准。结果表明,患者自身会诊的录音带相较于仅提供口头信息具有额外价值。然而,为患者提供通用录音带并不能提高信息记忆,甚至可能抑制患者的记忆。此外,尽管证据有限,但有科学证据表明,使用问题提示单(QPS)对信息记忆有积极影响,前提是医生积极推荐该提示单。未发现为患者提供会诊总结信对记忆有影响的证据,尽管关于这一主题的研究较少。总之,该评价表明,针对个体癌症患者的干预措施,如会诊录音带或问题提示单,最为有效。需要进一步开展研究以得出可靠结果。