• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新审视慢性病患者赋权:对自我效能和身体控制模型的批判

Reconsidering patient empowerment in chronic illness: a critique of models of self-efficacy and bodily control.

作者信息

Aujoulat Isabelle, Marcolongo Renzo, Bonadiman Leopoldo, Deccache Alain

机构信息

Université Catholique de Louvain, Health and Patient Education Unit RESO, School of Public Health, Avenue Mounier, Bruxelles, Belgium.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2008 Mar;66(5):1228-39. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.034. Epub 2007 Dec 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.034
PMID:18155338
Abstract

Studies that focus on patient empowerment tend to address more specifically two issues of patients' experience of illness: managing regimens and relating to health-care providers. Other aspects of illness experience, such as coming to terms with disrupted identities, tend to be overlooked. The outcome of empowerment is therefore usually referred to as achieving self-efficacy, mastery and control. We conducted an inductive exploratory study, based on individual in-depth interviews with 40 chronically ill patients in Belgium and Italy, in order to understand the process of empowerment as it may occur in patients whose experience of illness has at some point induced a feeling of powerlessness, which we conceptualised as a threat to their senses of security and identity. Our findings show that empowerment and control are not one and the same thing. We describe patient empowerment as a process of personal transformation which occurs through a double process of (i) "holding on" to previous self-representations and roles and learning to control the disease and treatment, so as to differentiate one's self from illness on the one hand, and on the other hand (ii) "letting go", by accepting to relinquish control, so as to integrate illness and illness-driven boundaries as being part of a reconciled self. Whereas the process of separating identities ("holding on") was indeed found to be linked to efforts aimed at taking control and maintaining or regaining a sense of mastery, the process of reconciling identities ("letting go") was found to be linked to a need for coherence, which included a search for meaning and the acceptance that not everything is controllable. We argue that the process of relinquishing control is as central to empowerment as is the process of gaining control. As a "successful" process of empowerment occurs when patients come to terms with their threatened security and identity, not only with their treatment, it may be facilitated by health-care providers through the use of narratives.

摘要

关注患者赋权的研究往往更具体地探讨患者疾病体验的两个问题

管理治疗方案以及与医疗服务提供者的关系。疾病体验的其他方面,比如接受身份的改变,往往被忽视。因此,赋权的结果通常被认为是实现自我效能感、掌控感和控制感。我们进行了一项归纳性探索性研究,基于对比利时和意大利40名慢性病患者的个人深度访谈,以了解赋权过程,这一过程可能发生在那些疾病体验在某个时刻引发了无力感的患者身上,我们将这种无力感概念化为对其安全感和身份认同的威胁。我们的研究结果表明,赋权和控制并非同一回事。我们将患者赋权描述为一个个人转变的过程,它通过以下双重过程发生:一方面,(i)“坚持”以前的自我认知和角色,并学会控制疾病和治疗,从而使自己与疾病区分开来;另一方面,(ii)通过接受放弃控制来“放手”,以便将疾病和疾病导致的界限整合为和解自我的一部分。虽然身份分离的过程(“坚持”)确实与旨在获得控制并维持或重新获得掌控感的努力相关,但身份和解的过程(“放手”)与对连贯性的需求相关,这包括对意义的探寻以及接受并非一切都可控的事实。我们认为,放弃控制的过程与获得控制的过程对于赋权同样重要。当患者不仅接受治疗,还接受其受到威胁的安全感和身份认同时,赋权作为一个“成功”的过程才会发生,医疗服务提供者可以通过使用叙事来促进这一过程。

相似文献

1
Reconsidering patient empowerment in chronic illness: a critique of models of self-efficacy and bodily control.重新审视慢性病患者赋权:对自我效能和身体控制模型的批判
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Mar;66(5):1228-39. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.034. Epub 2007 Dec 21.
2
The perspective of patients on their experience of powerlessness.患者对自身无助体验的看法。
Qual Health Res. 2007 Jul;17(6):772-85. doi: 10.1177/1049732307302665.
3
The empowerment process in people with diabetes: an Iranian perspective.糖尿病患者的赋权过程:伊朗视角
Int Nurs Rev. 2008 Dec;55(4):447-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2008.00664.x.
4
Patient empowerment in theory and practice: polysemy or cacophony?患者赋权的理论与实践:一词多义还是声音嘈杂?
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Apr;66(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.008. Epub 2006 Nov 2.
5
Individual empowerment among Chinese cancer patients in Hong Kong.中国香港癌症患者的个人赋权
West J Nurs Res. 2004 Feb;26(1):59-75; discussion 76-84. doi: 10.1177/0193945903259037.
6
Independence/dependence--a contradictory relationship? Life with a chronic illness.独立/依赖——一种矛盾的关系?与慢性病共存的生活。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2006 Sep;20(3):261-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2006.00403.x.
7
The complexity of patient participation: lessons learned from patients' illness narratives.患者参与的复杂性:从患者的疾病叙述中汲取的经验教训。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Sep;62(3):323-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.005. Epub 2006 Aug 2.
8
Self-efficacy and empowerment as outcomes of self-stigmatizing and coping in schizophrenia.自我效能感和赋权作为精神分裂症自我污名化及应对的结果
Psychiatry Res. 2007 Feb 28;150(1):71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2006.07.005. Epub 2007 Jan 30.
9
Ever decreasing circles: terminal illness, empowerment and decision-making.不断缩小的圈子:绝症、赋权与决策
J Prim Health Care. 2010 Jun;2(2):130-5.
10
Does NHS Direct empower patients?国民保健署直接服务是否赋予了患者权力?
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Oct;61(8):1761-71. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.03.028.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations of Self-Management Care and Shared Decision-Making with Glycemic Control and Psychosocial Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.2型糖尿病患者自我管理护理和共同决策与血糖控制及心理社会结局的关联
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Aug 2;19:2295-2307. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S534066. eCollection 2025.
2
Making "inclusion" more than a buzzword: A critical interpretive synthesis of literature about recruiting seldom-heard groups in health research.让“纳入”不止是个流行语:关于在健康研究中招募罕有群体的文献的批判性解释性综述
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 12;20(6):e0318466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318466. eCollection 2025.
3
Between empowerment, patronization, and surveillance. A semi-structured interview study with persons with dementia and family caregivers on the empowering opportunities and perils of intelligent assistive technologies.
介于赋权、施惠与监督之间。一项针对痴呆症患者及其家庭照料者开展的关于智能辅助技术的赋权机遇与风险的半结构化访谈研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Apr 5;26(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01203-7.
4
Patient empowerment: a critical evaluation and prescription for a foundational definition.患者赋权:对基础定义的批判性评估与建议
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 17;15:1473345. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1473345. eCollection 2024.
5
Empowerment in structures. Practical-ethical considerations of the preconditions for technology-assisted dementia care in Germany based on an expert-interview study.结构中的赋权。基于专家访谈研究对德国技术辅助痴呆症护理前提条件的实践伦理考量。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 10;15:1437967. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1437967. eCollection 2024.
6
The impact of empowerment theory-based health education on Alzheimer's disease informal caregivers: a randomized controlled trial.基于赋权理论的健康教育对阿尔茨海默病非专业照护者的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 27;12:1393823. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1393823. eCollection 2024.
7
Patient Empowerment for Those Living with Parkinson's Disease.帕金森病患者的赋权。
J Parkinsons Dis. 2024;14(s1):S173-S180. doi: 10.3233/JPD-230235.
8
Responsibility endowing power: A theoretical framework of health empowerment for Chinese older people with chronic illness.赋权责任:中国慢性病老年人群体健康赋权的理论框架
Nurs Open. 2024 Jul;11(7):e2236. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2236.
9
Balancing feeling 'prepared' without feeling 'devoured': A qualitative study of self-care from the perspective of self-empowered persons living with Parkinson's disease in Sweden.平衡“有准备”的感觉而不感到“被吞噬”:瑞典自感有能力的帕金森病患者的自我护理的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14027. doi: 10.1111/hex.14027.
10
Improving self-management and diabetes indicators in adolescents with type 1 diabetes through self-care education.通过自我护理教育改善1型糖尿病青少年的自我管理和糖尿病指标。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2023 Oct;12(10):2322-2327. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_373_23. Epub 2023 Oct 11.