Karsenty Gilles, Coquet-Reinier Benjamin, Elzayat Ehab, Lemieux Marie-Claude, Corcos Jacques
Urology Department, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Jun;19(6):823-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0536-0.
Urodynamic parameters and satisfaction were recorded after micturition in the seated position versus the standing position with a single-use device (P-Mate) in healthy women. Healthy adult women were recruited. Eligibility criteria were: no past urological history and no urological symptoms. Volunteers were given four P-Mates to use during a week and a satisfaction questionnaire to fill. After this trial week, they were invited to perform four flowmetries, two in the seated position and two standing up, with the P-Mate. Seated and standing flowmetry parameters were compared (by paired t-test). Twenty women completed the study. There was no difference in the maximum flow rate (Qmax), voided volume and post-void residual (PVR) in the standing versus the seated position. In terms of Qmax and PVR in healthy women, urinating standing up was as efficient as in the seated position. A majority of participants were satisfied with the device.
在健康女性中,使用一次性设备(P-Mate)分别记录她们坐姿排尿和站姿排尿后的尿动力学参数及满意度。招募了健康成年女性。入选标准为:无既往泌尿系统病史且无泌尿系统症状。志愿者被给予四个P-Mate在一周内使用,并填写一份满意度问卷。在这个试验周之后,邀请她们使用P-Mate进行四次尿流率测定,两次坐姿,两次站姿。比较坐姿和站姿的尿流率参数(采用配对t检验)。20名女性完成了研究。站立位与坐位的最大尿流率(Qmax)、排尿量和残余尿量(PVR)没有差异。就健康女性的Qmax和PVR而言,站立排尿与坐位排尿一样有效。大多数参与者对该设备感到满意。