Drieling T, Schärer L O, Langosch J M
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2007;16(4):230-6. doi: 10.1002/mpr.226.
The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS) is a rating scale for depression, widely used in international multicentre studies. There are two corresponding versions: a self-rated (IDS-SR) and a clinician-rated (IDS-C) scale. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the German versions of the IDS-SR and IDS-C in comparison to the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) and to the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). The sample consisted of 59 inpatients and outpatients treated for unipolar or bipolar disorders. Internal consistency of the IDS-SR and IDS-C was found highly acceptable (alpha = 0.94 and alpha = 0.93). Item-total-correlations of the IDS-SR revealed that 68% of the items were strongly correlated with the sum score (> or =0.50). This was in the same range with the IDS-C (54%), the HRSD (53%) and the BDI (76%). Furthermore, there is a high concurrent validity (r > or = 0.88) of the IDS-SR with the IDS-C, the BDI and the HRSD. Substantial score-differences between inpatients and outpatients indicate a good discriminant validity. It is concluded that the German version of the IDS is a useful instrument for the assessment of depressive symptoms and that it has the same highly acceptable psychometric properties as the original English version.
抑郁症状量表(IDS)是一种用于评估抑郁的评定量表,广泛应用于国际多中心研究。它有两个相应版本:自评版(IDS-SR)和临床医生评定版(IDS-C)量表。本研究的目的是将IDS-SR和IDS-C的德语版本与汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HRSD)和贝克抑郁量表(BDI)相比较,评估其信度和效度。样本包括59名因单相或双相情感障碍接受治疗的住院患者和门诊患者。发现IDS-SR和IDS-C的内部一致性非常可接受(α系数分别为0.94和0.93)。IDS-SR的项目与总分的相关性显示,68%的项目与总分高度相关(≥0.50)。这与IDS-C(54%)、HRSD(53%)和BDI(76%)处于同一范围。此外,IDS-SR与IDS-C、BDI和HRSD之间存在较高的同时效度(r≥0.88)。住院患者和门诊患者之间存在显著的分数差异,表明具有良好的区分效度。结论是,IDS的德语版本是评估抑郁症状的有用工具,并且具有与原始英语版本相同的高度可接受的心理测量学特性。