Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0612, USA.
Global Health. 2008 Jan 17;4:2. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-4-2.
The global tobacco epidemic claims 5 million lives each year, facilitated by the ability of transnational tobacco companies to delay or thwart meaningful tobacco control worldwide. A series of cross-company tobacco industry "issues management organizations" has played an important role in coordinating and implementing common strategies to defeat tobacco control efforts at international, national, and regional levels. This study examines the development and enumerates the activities of these organizations and explores the implications of continuing industry cooperation for global public health.
Using a snowball sampling strategy, we collected documentary data from tobacco industry documents archives and assembled them into a chronologically organized case study.
The International Committee on Smoking Issues (ICOSI) was formed in 1977 by seven tobacco company chief executives to create common anti-tobacco control strategies and build a global network of regional and national manufacturing associations. The organization's name subsequently changed to INFOTAB. The multinational companies built the organization rapidly: by 1984, it had 69 members operating in 57 countries. INFOTAB material, including position papers and "action kits" helped members challenge local tobacco control measures and maintain tobacco-friendly environments. In 1992 INFOTAB was replaced by two smaller organizations. The Tobacco Documentation Centre, which continues to operate, distributes smoking-related information and industry argumentation to members, some produced by cross-company committees. Agro-Tobacco Services, and now Hallmark Marketing Services, assists the INFOTAB-backed and industry supported International Tobacco Growers Association in advancing claims regarding the economic importance of tobacco in developing nations.
The massive scale and scope of this industry effort illustrate how corporate interests, when threatened by the globalization of public health, sidestep competitive concerns to coordinate their activities. The global network of national and regional manufacturing associations created and nurtured by INFOTAB remains active, particularly in relation to the recently negotiated global health treaty, the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Policymakers should be aware that although these associations claim to represent only national or regional interests, they are allied to and coordinated with a confederation of transnational tobacco companies seeking to protect profits by undermining public health.
全球烟草流行每年导致 500 万人死亡,跨国烟草公司能够延迟或阻挠全球范围内有意义的烟草控制,从而使这一情况更为恶化。一系列跨国烟草业“问题管理组织”在协调和实施旨在在国际、国家和地区各级挫败烟草控制工作的共同战略方面发挥了重要作用。本研究对这些组织的发展进行了考察,并列举了它们的活动,探讨了继续开展行业合作对全球公共卫生的影响。
我们采用滚雪球抽样策略,从烟草业文件档案中收集文献资料,并将其整理成按时间顺序组织的案例研究。
国际吸烟问题委员会(ICOSI)于 1977 年由七家烟草公司首席执行官组成,目的是制定共同的反烟草控制战略,并建立一个全球性的区域和国家制造协会网络。该组织随后更名为 INFOTAB。跨国公司迅速建立了该组织:到 1984 年,它已拥有 69 个成员,在 57 个国家开展业务。INFOTAB 材料,包括立场文件和“行动工具包”,帮助成员们对地方烟草控制措施提出质疑,并维持有利于烟草的环境。1992 年,INFOTAB 被两个较小的组织所取代。烟草文献中心(Tobacco Documentation Centre)仍在运作,向成员分发与吸烟有关的信息和行业论证,其中一些是由跨公司委员会编写的。Agro-Tobacco Services(现名为 Hallmark Marketing Services)协助 INFOTAB 支持的和行业支持的国际烟草种植者协会提出主张,即烟草在发展中国家的经济重要性。
该行业的大规模和广泛范围说明了当公司利益受到公共卫生全球化的威胁时,它们是如何不顾竞争关切而协调活动的。INFOTAB 创建和培育的国家和地区制造协会网络仍然活跃,特别是在最近谈判达成的全球卫生条约《烟草控制框架公约》方面。决策者应该意识到,尽管这些协会声称只代表国家或地区的利益,但它们与寻求通过破坏公共卫生来保护利润的跨国烟草公司联盟和协调。