Center for Tobacco Control Research & Education, University of California, San Francisco, 530 Parnassus Avenue, Box 1390, San Francisco, CA 94143-1390, USA.
Tob Control. 2013 Mar;22(2):154-64. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050149. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
To analyse how local tobacco companies in the Nordic countries, individually and through National Manufacturers' Associations, cooperated with British American Tobacco and Philip Morris in denying the health hazards of smoking and undermining tobacco control.
Analysis of tobacco control policies in the Nordic countries and tobacco industry documents.
Nordic countries were early adopters of tobacco control policies. The multinational tobacco companies recognised this fact and mobilised to oppose these policies, in part because of fear that they would set unfavourable precedents. Since at least 1972, the Nordic tobacco companies were well informed about and willing to participate in the multinational companies activities to obscure the health dangers of smoking and secondhand smoke and to oppose tobacco control policies. Cooperation between multinational companies, Nordic national manufacturer associations and local companies ensured a united front on smoking and health issues in the Nordic area that was consistent with the positions that the multinational companies were taking. This cooperation delayed smoke-free laws and undermined other tobacco control measures.
Local tobacco companies worked with multinational companies to undermine tobacco control in distant and small Nordic markets because of concern that pioneering policies initiated in Nordic countries would spread to bigger market areas. Claims by the local Nordic companies that they were not actively involved with the multinationals are not supported by the facts. These results also demonstrate that the industry appreciates the global importance of both positive and negative public health precedents in tobacco control.
分析北欧各国的地方烟草公司如何单独地以及通过国家制造商协会与英美烟草公司和菲利普莫里斯公司合作,否认吸烟的健康危害并破坏烟草控制。
分析北欧国家的烟草控制政策和烟草业文件。
北欧国家是烟草控制政策的早期采用者。跨国烟草公司认识到这一事实,并动员起来反对这些政策,部分原因是担心这些政策会开创不利的先例。自 1972 年以来,北欧烟草公司非常了解并愿意参与跨国公司的活动,以掩盖吸烟和二手烟的健康危害,并反对烟草控制政策。跨国公司、北欧国家制造商协会和当地公司之间的合作确保了北欧地区在吸烟和健康问题上的统一战线,与跨国公司采取的立场一致。这种合作延迟了无烟法律的实施,并破坏了其他烟草控制措施。
由于担心在北欧国家启动的开创性政策会蔓延到更大的市场领域,地方烟草公司与跨国公司合作破坏了遥远和较小的北欧市场的烟草控制。北欧地方公司声称它们没有积极参与跨国公司的活动,这与事实不符。这些结果还表明,该行业认识到烟草控制中积极和消极的公共卫生先例在全球的重要性。