• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利妥昔单抗联合环磷酰胺、长春新碱和泼尼松治疗晚期滤泡性淋巴瘤的经济学评估。

Economic evaluation of rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisolone for advanced follicular lymphoma.

作者信息

Hornberger John, Reyes Carolina, Lubeck Deborah, Valente Nancy

机构信息

Cedar Associates LLC, Menlo Park, CA, USA.

出版信息

Leuk Lymphoma. 2008 Feb;49(2):227-36. doi: 10.1080/10428190701769665.

DOI:10.1080/10428190701769665
PMID:18231908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2430747/
Abstract

The addition of rituximab to cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisolone (CVP) for advanced follicular lymphoma increases median time to progression by 17 months. A US societal cost-effectiveness of R-CVP versus CVP is estimated for a representative 50-year-old patient. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival are based on a randomized Phase III trial. Costs are estimated using Medicare reimbursement rates and published drug price data, and include drug and administration costs, adverse events, treatment of relapses, and end-of-life care. Utility estimates are derived from the literature and a 3% discount rate is employed. Mean overall survival is projected to be 1.51 years longer for patients assigned to R-CVP versus CVP. The cost per quality-adjusted year of life gained is $28,565. The utility associated with stable or progressive disease and the unit drug cost of rituximab most influence the findings. The cost-effectiveness ratio of R-CVP compared with CVP is projected to be cost-effective in the United States under a range of sensitivity analyses.

摘要

对于晚期滤泡性淋巴瘤,在环磷酰胺、长春新碱和泼尼松(CVP)方案中添加利妥昔单抗可使中位进展时间延长17个月。针对一名具有代表性的50岁患者,评估了R-CVP与CVP在美国的社会成本效益。无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期基于一项随机III期试验。成本使用医疗保险报销率和已公布的药品价格数据进行估算,包括药品和给药成本、不良事件、复发治疗以及临终护理。效用估计值来自文献,并采用3%的贴现率。预计分配到R-CVP组的患者的平均总生存期比CVP组患者长1.51年。每获得一个质量调整生命年的成本为28,565美元。与病情稳定或进展相关的效用以及利妥昔单抗的单位药品成本对研究结果影响最大。在一系列敏感性分析下,R-CVP与CVP相比的成本效益比预计在美国具有成本效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42cc/2430747/0103c18098ca/glal-49-227-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42cc/2430747/498c7ed09d74/glal-49-227-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42cc/2430747/775bdea06679/glal-49-227-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42cc/2430747/32177c2228b7/glal-49-227-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42cc/2430747/0103c18098ca/glal-49-227-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42cc/2430747/498c7ed09d74/glal-49-227-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42cc/2430747/775bdea06679/glal-49-227-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42cc/2430747/32177c2228b7/glal-49-227-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42cc/2430747/0103c18098ca/glal-49-227-f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Economic evaluation of rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisolone for advanced follicular lymphoma.利妥昔单抗联合环磷酰胺、长春新碱和泼尼松治疗晚期滤泡性淋巴瘤的经济学评估。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2008 Feb;49(2):227-36. doi: 10.1080/10428190701769665.
2
[Economic analysis of rituximab in combination with cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisolone in the treatment of patients with advanced follicular lymphoma in Portugal].[利妥昔单抗联合环磷酰胺、长春新碱和泼尼松龙治疗葡萄牙晚期滤泡性淋巴瘤患者的经济学分析]
Acta Med Port. 2010 Nov-Dec;23(6):1025-34. Epub 2010 Dec 28.
3
Rituximab for the first-line treatment of stage III-IV follicular lymphoma (review of Technology Appraisal No. 110): a systematic review and economic evaluation.利妥昔单抗作为 III-IV 期滤泡性淋巴瘤的一线治疗药物(对技术评估第 110 号的回顾):一项系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(37):1-253, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta16370.
4
An evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of rituximab in combination with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in the UK.评估利妥昔单抗联合化疗治疗英国滤泡性非霍奇金淋巴瘤一线治疗的成本效益。
Value Health. 2010 Jun-Jul;13(4):346-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00676.x. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
5
Rituximab for the first-line treatment of stage III/IV follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.利妥昔单抗用于Ⅲ/Ⅳ期滤泡性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的一线治疗。
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Jun;13 Suppl 1:23-8. doi: 10.3310/hta13suppl1/04.
6
Bendamustine-rituximab: a cost-utility analysis in first-line treatment of indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in England and Wales.苯达莫司汀-利妥昔单抗:在英格兰和威尔士惰性非霍奇金淋巴瘤一线治疗中的成本效用分析。
J Med Econ. 2014 Feb;17(2):111-24. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.873044. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
7
CVP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CVP as first-line treatment for advanced follicular lymphoma.环磷酰胺、长春新碱、泼尼松(CVP)化疗联合利妥昔单抗与单纯CVP作为晚期滤泡性淋巴瘤一线治疗方案的比较
Blood. 2005 Feb 15;105(4):1417-23. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-08-3175. Epub 2004 Oct 19.
8
A quality-adjusted survival analysis (Q-TWiST) of rituximab plus CVP vs CVP alone in first-line treatment of advanced follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.利妥昔单抗联合 CVP 与 CVP 单药一线治疗晚期滤泡性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的质量调整生存分析(Q-TWiST)。
Br J Cancer. 2010 Jan 5;102(1):19-22. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605443. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
9
Cost-effectiveness of extended adjuvant rituximab for US patients aged 65-70 years with follicular lymphoma in second remission.对于处于第二次缓解期的65 - 70岁美国滤泡性淋巴瘤患者,延长辅助使用利妥昔单抗的成本效益分析。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma. 2008 Jun;8(3):166-70. doi: 10.3816/CLM.2008.n.020.
10
Long-Term Results of the FOLL05 Trial Comparing R-CVP Versus R-CHOP Versus R-FM for the Initial Treatment of Patients With Advanced-Stage Symptomatic Follicular Lymphoma.FOLL05 试验的长期结果:比较 R-CVP、R-CHOP 和 R-FM 方案治疗初治晚期症状性滤泡性淋巴瘤患者的疗效。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;36(7):689-696. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.1652. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
An Economic Evaluation of the TROG 99.03 Trial: Systemic Therapy After Radiotherapy in Early-Stage Follicular Lymphoma.TROG 99.03试验的经济学评估:早期滤泡性淋巴瘤放疗后的全身治疗
EJHaem. 2025 Feb 12;6(1):e70002. doi: 10.1002/jha2.70002. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside the inter-B-NHL ritux 2010 trial: rituximab in children and adolescents with B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.伴随 inter-B-NHL ritux 2010 试验的成本效益分析:利妥昔单抗治疗儿童和青少年 B 细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Mar;25(2):307-317. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01581-y. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
3
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Vedolizumab Compared With Infliximab in Anti-TNF-α-Naïve Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis in China.

本文引用的文献

1
Immunochemotherapy with rituximab and overall survival in patients with indolent or mantle cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.利妥昔单抗免疫化疗与惰性或套细胞淋巴瘤患者的总生存期:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 May 2;99(9):706-14. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djk152.
2
Rituximab added to first-line mitoxantrone, chlorambucil, and prednisolone chemotherapy followed by interferon maintenance prolongs survival in patients with advanced follicular lymphoma: an East German Study Group Hematology and Oncology Study.利妥昔单抗联合一线米托蒽醌、苯丁酸氮芥和泼尼松龙化疗,随后进行干扰素维持治疗,可延长晚期滤泡性淋巴瘤患者的生存期:东德血液学和肿瘤学研究组的一项研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 20;25(15):1986-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.4618. Epub 2007 Apr 9.
3
中国抗 TNF-α 初治中重度溃疡性结肠炎患者维得利珠单抗与英夫利昔单抗的成本效果分析。
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 20;9:704889. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.704889. eCollection 2021.
4
Cost-Effectiveness Analyses, Costs and Resource Use, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Follicular or Marginal Zone Lymphoma: Systematic Reviews.滤泡性或边缘区淋巴瘤患者的成本效益分析、成本与资源利用以及健康相关生活质量:系统评价
Pharmacoecon Open. 2020 Dec;4(4):575-591. doi: 10.1007/s41669-020-00204-z.
5
A Generic Model for Follicular Lymphoma: Predicting Cost, Life Expectancy, and Quality-Adjusted-Life-Year Using UK Population-Based Observational Data.滤泡性淋巴瘤通用模型:利用英国基于人群的观测性数据预测成本、预期寿命和质量调整生命年。
Value Health. 2018 Oct;21(10):1176-1185. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
6
Cost-effectiveness of ustekinumab in moderate to severe Crohn's disease in Sweden.优特克单抗治疗瑞典中重度克罗恩病的成本效益
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018 Aug 2;16:28. doi: 10.1186/s12962-018-0114-y. eCollection 2018.
7
Cost-effectiveness of vedolizumab compared with conventional therapy for ulcerative colitis patients in the UK.在英国,维多珠单抗与传统疗法相比治疗溃疡性结肠炎患者的成本效益。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Oct 16;9:641-652. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S135609. eCollection 2017.
8
Comparing the cost-effectiveness of rituximab maintenance and radioimmunotherapy consolidation versus observation following first-line therapy in patients with follicular lymphoma.比较利妥昔单抗维持治疗和放射免疫治疗巩固治疗与滤泡性淋巴瘤患者一线治疗后观察的成本效益。
Value Health. 2015 Mar;18(2):189-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.12.017.
9
Subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of rituximab: pharmacokinetics, CD20 target coverage and B-cell depletion in cynomolgus monkeys.皮下注射与静脉注射利妥昔单抗:药代动力学、食蟹猴 CD20 靶点覆盖率和 B 细胞耗竭。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 12;8(11):e80533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080533. eCollection 2013.
10
Impact on Medical Cost, Cumulative Survival, and Cost-Effectiveness of Adding Rituximab to First-Line Chemotherapy for Follicular Lymphoma in Elderly Patients: An Observational Cohort Study Based on SEER-Medicare.利妥昔单抗添加至老年滤泡性淋巴瘤患者一线化疗对医疗成本、累积生存率及成本效益的影响:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库-医疗保险数据的观察性队列研究
J Cancer Epidemiol. 2012;2012:978391. doi: 10.1155/2012/978391. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
Incorporating quality of evidence into decision analytic modeling.将证据质量纳入决策分析模型。
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jan 16;146(2):133-41. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-2-200701160-00008.
4
Maintenance therapy with rituximab leads to a significant prolongation of response duration after salvage therapy with a combination of rituximab, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and mitoxantrone (R-FCM) in patients with recurring and refractory follicular and mantle cell lymphomas: Results of a prospective randomized study of the German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group (GLSG).对于复发和难治性滤泡性及套细胞淋巴瘤患者,在使用利妥昔单抗、氟达拉滨、环磷酰胺和米托蒽醌联合方案(R-FCM)进行挽救治疗后,采用利妥昔单抗维持治疗可显著延长缓解持续时间:德国低度淋巴瘤研究组(GLSG)一项前瞻性随机研究的结果。
Blood. 2006 Dec 15;108(13):4003-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-04-016725. Epub 2006 Aug 31.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of computerized tomography in the routine follow-up of patients after primary treatment for Hodgkin's disease.霍奇金病初次治疗后患者常规随访中计算机断层扫描的成本效益分析
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Sep 1;24(25):4116-22. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.0409.
6
Rituximab maintenance improves clinical outcome of relapsed/resistant follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma in patients both with and without rituximab during induction: results of a prospective randomized phase 3 intergroup trial.利妥昔单抗维持治疗可改善复发/难治性滤泡性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的临床结局,无论诱导治疗期间是否使用过利妥昔单抗:一项前瞻性随机3期组间试验的结果
Blood. 2006 Nov 15;108(10):3295-301. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-05-021113. Epub 2006 Jul 27.
7
Frontline therapy with rituximab added to the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) significantly improves the outcome for patients with advanced-stage follicular lymphoma compared with therapy with CHOP alone: results of a prospective randomized study of the German Low-Grade Lymphoma Study Group.与单纯使用环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱和泼尼松(CHOP)方案治疗相比,在CHOP方案基础上加用利妥昔单抗进行一线治疗可显著改善晚期滤泡性淋巴瘤患者的预后:德国低度淋巴瘤研究组的一项前瞻性随机研究结果。
Blood. 2005 Dec 1;106(12):3725-32. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-01-0016. Epub 2005 Aug 25.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of rituximab combined with chop for treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.利妥昔单抗联合CHOP方案治疗弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的成本效益分析
Value Health. 2005 Jul-Aug;8(4):462-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.00037.x.
9
Improved survival of follicular lymphoma patients in the United States.美国滤泡性淋巴瘤患者生存率提高。
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 1;23(22):5019-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.503. Epub 2005 Jun 27.
10
Cost utility in the United States of rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone for the treatment of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.利妥昔单抗联合环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松治疗老年弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤在美国的成本效益。
Cancer. 2005 Apr 15;103(8):1644-51. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20956.