• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大剂量雷贝拉唑治疗癔球症患者的短期经验性试验中的缓解率及缓解预测因素

Response rate and predictors of response in a short-term empirical trial of high-dose rabeprazole in patients with globus.

作者信息

Sinn D H, Kim J H, Kim S, Son H J, Kim J J, Rhee J C, Rhee P-L

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Jun;27(12):1275-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03659.x. Epub 2008 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03659.x
PMID:18315581
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the aetiology of globus (the sensation of a lump in the throat) remains unclear, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is associated with globus. A short-term trial with a high-dose proton pump inhibitor has been shown to be a sensitive tool for diagnosing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

AIM

To see whether patients with globus symptom responded to short-term high-dose rabeprazole trial and assess predictors of symptom response.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients with globus symptom were analysed. Patients received rabeprazole 20 mg b.d. for 14 days. Patients completed a daily diary assessing the severity and frequency of globus.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients (64%) were diagnosed clinically with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Based on the pH testing and endoscopy, the prevalence of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease was 22% (14 of 64). The globus symptom score was significantly higher in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease compared with patients without gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (P = 0.004). Two patients (3%) had complete resolution and 22 (34%) had more than a 50% improvement in the globus symptom score. Endoscopic findings (P = 0.714), pathological acid exposure on pH testing (P = 0.741) or baseline gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms (P = 0.606) were not associated with improvement of globus symptom.

CONCLUSION

While gastro-oesophageal reflux disease may be an aggravating factor in patients with globus, it does not appear to be the sole cause of globus symptom.

摘要

背景

尽管癔球症(咽喉部有异物感)的病因仍不明确,但胃食管反流病与癔球症相关。短期使用高剂量质子泵抑制剂的试验已被证明是诊断胃食管反流病的敏感工具。

目的

观察有癔球症症状的患者对短期高剂量雷贝拉唑试验的反应,并评估症状反应的预测因素。

方法

对64例有癔球症症状的患者进行分析。患者每日口服20mg雷贝拉唑,共14天。患者完成每日日志,评估癔球症的严重程度和发作频率。

结果

41例患者(64%)临床诊断为胃食管反流病。根据pH值检测和内镜检查,胃食管反流病的患病率为22%(64例中的14例)。与无胃食管反流病的患者相比,胃食管反流病患者的癔球症症状评分显著更高(P = 0.004)。2例患者(3%)症状完全缓解,22例患者(34%)的癔球症症状评分改善超过50%。内镜检查结果(P = 0.714)、pH值检测的病理性酸暴露(P = 0.741)或基线胃食管反流病症状(P = 0.606)与癔球症症状的改善无关。

结论

虽然胃食管反流病可能是癔球症患者的一个加重因素,但它似乎不是癔球症症状的唯一原因。

相似文献

1
Response rate and predictors of response in a short-term empirical trial of high-dose rabeprazole in patients with globus.大剂量雷贝拉唑治疗癔球症患者的短期经验性试验中的缓解率及缓解预测因素
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Jun;27(12):1275-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03659.x. Epub 2008 Feb 27.
2
The effect of a therapeutic trial of high-dose rabeprazole on symptom response of patients with non-cardiac chest pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial.大剂量雷贝拉唑治疗试验对非心源性胸痛患者症状反应的影响:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的交叉试验。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Sep 15;22(6):547-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02620.x.
3
The effect of an empirical trial of high-dose lansoprazole on symptom response of patients with non-cardiac chest pain--a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial.大剂量兰索拉唑经验性试验对非心源性胸痛患者症状反应的影响——一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉试验。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 May 15;19(10):1123-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.01941.x.
4
Treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease with rabeprazole in primary and secondary care: does Helicobacter pylori infection affect proton pump inhibitor effectiveness?雷贝拉唑在基层医疗和二级医疗中治疗胃食管反流病:幽门螺杆菌感染会影响质子泵抑制剂的疗效吗?
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Aug 15;20(4):451-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02096.x.
5
Comparison of one-week and two-week empirical trial with a high-dose rabeprazole in non-cardiac chest pain patients.高剂量雷贝拉唑对非心源性胸痛患者进行一周和两周经验性试验的比较。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Sep;24(9):1504-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05859.x.
6
International validation of ReQuest in patients with endoscopy-negative gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.ReQuest在胃镜检查阴性的胃食管反流病患者中的国际验证
Digestion. 2007;75 Suppl 1:48-54. doi: 10.1159/000101082. Epub 2007 May 4.
7
Rabeprazole is equivalent to omeprazole in the treatment of erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. A randomised, double-blind, comparative study of rabeprazole and omeprazole 20 mg in acute treatment of reflux oesophagitis, followed by a maintenance open-label, low-dose therapy with rabeprazole.雷贝拉唑在治疗糜烂性胃食管反流病方面与奥美拉唑等效。一项关于雷贝拉唑和20毫克奥美拉唑治疗反流性食管炎急性发作的随机、双盲、对照研究,随后采用雷贝拉唑进行维持期开放标签低剂量治疗。
Dig Liver Dis. 2005 Oct;37(10):741-50. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2005.04.026.
8
Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in chronic laryngitis: prevalence and response to acid-suppressive therapy.慢性喉炎中的胃食管反流病:患病率及对抑酸治疗的反应
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Feb 1;25(3):287-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03185.x.
9
Clinical trial: the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care--prospective randomized comparison of rabeprazole 20 mg with esomeprazole 20 and 40 mg.临床试验:基层医疗中胃食管反流病的治疗——雷贝拉唑20毫克与埃索美拉唑20毫克及40毫克的前瞻性随机对照研究
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 May 1;29(9):967-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.03948.x. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
10
Clinical trial: maintenance intermittent therapy with rabeprazole 20 mg in patients with symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease - a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study.临床试验:在有症状的胃食管反流病患者中使用雷贝拉唑 20mg 进行维持间歇治疗 - 一项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机研究。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 May;31(9):950-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04254.x. Epub 2010 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Reflux Finding Score and Reflux Symptom Index Potential Indicators for Diagnosis and Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease.反流发现评分和反流症状指数:喉咽反流疾病诊断与管理的潜在指标
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Aug;76(4):3239-3244. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04657-0. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
2
Determination of the Relationship between Globus-Type Complaints and COVID-19 Anxiety in Adult Cases with COVID-19.确定成人 COVID-19 病例中球型抱怨与 COVID-19 焦虑之间的关系。
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2024;76(2):183-191. doi: 10.1159/000533564. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
3
Voice outcomes of laryngopharyngeal reflux treatment: a systematic review of 1483 patients.
喉咽反流治疗的嗓音结果:对1483例患者的系统评价
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jan;274(1):1-23. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-3984-7. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
4
Effect of a traditional herbal medicine, hangekobokuto, on the sensation of a lump in the throat in patients with respiratory diseases.传统草药半夏厚朴汤对呼吸系统疾病患者咽部异物感的影响。
Biomed Rep. 2016 Mar;4(3):384-386. doi: 10.3892/br.2016.592. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
5
Characteristics of thyroid nodules causing globus symptoms.引起咽喉部异物感症状的甲状腺结节的特征。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 May;272(5):1181-8. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3525-9. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
6
Is the proton pump inhibitor test helpful in patients with laryngeal symptoms?质子泵抑制剂试验对有喉部症状的患者是否有帮助?
Dig Dis Sci. 2013 Jun;58(6):1663-7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2540-6. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
7
Clinical predictors for response to proton pump inhibitor treatment in patients with globus.质子泵抑制剂治疗球部疾病患者反应的临床预测因子。
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013 Jan;19(1):47-53. doi: 10.5056/jnm.2013.19.1.47. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
8
Estimation of clinical predictive factors in treating patients with globus.治疗癔球症患者临床预测因素的评估
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013 Jan;19(1):1-2. doi: 10.5056/jnm.2013.19.1.1. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
9
How many cases of laryngopharyngeal reflux suspected by laryngoscopy are gastroesophageal reflux disease-related?经喉镜检查怀疑的咽反流病例中有多少与胃食管反流病有关?
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug 28;18(32):4363-70. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4363.
10
Globus pharyngeus: a review of its etiology, diagnosis and treatment.咽异感症:病因、诊断和治疗的综述。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 May 28;18(20):2462-71. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i20.2462.