Suppr超能文献

诱导期食管癌的电视辅助胸腔镜手术结果。

Results of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer during the induction period.

作者信息

Ninomiya Itasu, Osugi Harushi, Fujimura Takashi, Kayahara Masato, Takamura Hiroyuki, Takemura Masashi, Lee Shigeru, Nakagawara Hisatoshi, Nishimura Genichi, Ohta Tetsuo

机构信息

Gastroenterologic Surgery, Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-8641, Japan.

出版信息

Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Mar;56(3):119-25. doi: 10.1007/s11748-007-0196-5. Epub 2008 Mar 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The attainment of proficiency in thoracoscopic radical esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer requires much experience. We aimed to master this procedure safely with our regular surgical team members under the direction of an experienced surgeon. We evaluated the efficacy of instruction during the induction period and the significance of our results.

METHODS

We compared the results of 12 thoracic esophageal cancer patients who underwent thoracoscopic radical esophagectomy in our institution (group A) to those of the initial 17 patients who underwent the same operation at the director's institution (group B).

RESULTS

We were able to perform complete thoracoscopic radical esophagectomies without any direction after experiencing 10 cases that were performed under adequate direction. The number of dissected lymph nodes and the duration of the procedure were similar in the two groups: 34 (22-53) vs. 26 (9-55) nodes, P = 0.23; and 327.5 (230-455) vs. 315 (190-515) min, P = 0.947, respectively. The amount of thoracic blood loss was significantly less in group A than in group B: 185 (110-380) g vs. 440 (110-2360) g, P = 0.0035. Postoperative pneumonia and atelectasis were observed in 25.0% of group A patients and in 17.6% of group B patients. The incidence of recurrent nerve palsy was 30.7% in group A and 11.7% in group B, but there was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.19). The morbidity rates in group A and group B were 41.6% and 29.4%, respectively (P = 0.694).

CONCLUSION

Thoracoscopic radical esophagectomy can be mastered relatively quickly and safely under the direction of an experienced surgeon and a regular surgical team.

摘要

目的

熟练掌握胸段食管癌的胸腔镜根治性食管切除术需要丰富的经验。我们旨在在经验丰富的外科医生指导下,与我们常规的手术团队成员一起安全地掌握这一手术。我们评估了诱导期指导的效果以及我们结果的意义。

方法

我们将在本院接受胸腔镜根治性食管切除术的12例胸段食管癌患者的结果(A组)与在主任所在机构接受相同手术的最初17例患者的结果(B组)进行了比较。

结果

在经历了10例在充分指导下进行的手术后,我们能够在没有任何指导的情况下完成完全胸腔镜根治性食管切除术。两组的清扫淋巴结数量和手术时间相似:分别为34(22 - 53)个对26(9 - 55)个淋巴结,P = 0.23;以及327.5(230 - 455)分钟对315(190 - 515)分钟,P = 0.947。A组的胸腔失血量明显少于B组:185(110 - 380)克对440(110 - 2360)克,P = 0.0035。A组25.0%的患者和B组17.6%的患者出现术后肺炎和肺不张。A组喉返神经麻痹发生率为30.7%,B组为11.7%,但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.19)。A组和B组的发病率分别为41.6%和29.4%(P = 0.694)。

结论

在经验丰富的外科医生和常规手术团队的指导下,胸腔镜根治性食管切除术可以相对快速且安全地掌握。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验