• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食品中过敏原的概率风险评估模型:最低引发剂量和食物消费量的敏感性分析

Probabilistic risk assessment model for allergens in food: sensitivity analysis of the minimum eliciting dose and food consumption.

作者信息

Kruizinga A G, Briggs D, Crevel R W R, Knulst A C, van den Bosch L M C, Houben G F

机构信息

TNO Quality of Life, Zeist, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 May;46(5):1437-43. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2007.09.109. Epub 2007 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.fct.2007.09.109
PMID:18358932
Abstract

Previously, TNO developed a probabilistic model to predict the likelihood of an allergic reaction, resulting in a quantitative assessment of the risk associated with unintended exposure to food allergens. The likelihood is estimated by including in the model the proportion of the population who is allergic, the proportion consuming the food and the amount consumed, the likelihood of the food containing an adventitious allergen and its concentration, and the minimum eliciting dose (MED) distribution for the allergen. In the present work a sensitivity analysis was performed to identify which parts of the model most influence the output. A shift in the distribution of the MED reflecting a more potent allergen, and an increase in the proportion of the population consuming a food, increased the number of estimated allergic reactions considerably. In contrast, the number of estimated allergic reactions hardly changed when the MEDs were based on a more severe response, or when the amount of food consumed was increased. Development of this work will help to generate a more accurate picture of the potential public health impact of allergens. It highlights areas where research is best focused, specifically the determination of minimum eliciting doses and understanding of the food choices of allergic individuals.

摘要

此前,荷兰应用科学研究院(TNO)开发了一种概率模型来预测过敏反应的可能性,从而对意外接触食物过敏原相关风险进行定量评估。通过在模型中纳入过敏人群的比例、食用该食物的人群比例及其食用量、食物中含有偶然过敏原的可能性及其浓度,以及该过敏原的最低激发剂量(MED)分布来估计可能性。在本研究中,进行了敏感性分析以确定模型的哪些部分对输出结果影响最大。反映过敏原更强效的MED分布变化,以及食用某种食物的人群比例增加,会使估计的过敏反应数量大幅增加。相比之下,当MED基于更严重的反应时,或者当食用的食物量增加时,估计的过敏反应数量几乎没有变化。这项研究的开展将有助于更准确地描绘过敏原对公众健康的潜在影响。它突出了最值得关注研究的领域,特别是最低激发剂量的确定以及对过敏个体食物选择的了解。

相似文献

1
Probabilistic risk assessment model for allergens in food: sensitivity analysis of the minimum eliciting dose and food consumption.食品中过敏原的概率风险评估模型:最低引发剂量和食物消费量的敏感性分析
Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 May;46(5):1437-43. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2007.09.109. Epub 2007 Oct 1.
2
Risk assessment and food allergy: the probabilistic model applied to allergens.风险评估与食物过敏:应用于过敏原的概率模型
Food Chem Toxicol. 2007 Jan;45(1):49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2006.07.018. Epub 2006 Aug 10.
3
Quantitative risk assessment relating to adventitious presence of allergens in food: a probabilistic model applied to peanut in chocolate.定量风险评估与食物中过敏原的偶然存在有关:应用于巧克力中花生的概率模型。
Risk Anal. 2010 Jan;30(1):7-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01322.x. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
4
Hazard characterisation in food allergen risk assessment: the application of statistical approaches and the use of clinical data.食品过敏原风险评估中的危害特征描述:统计方法的应用及临床数据的使用
Food Chem Toxicol. 2007 May;45(5):691-701. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2006.09.005. Epub 2006 Nov 10.
5
Concentrations of undeclared allergens in food products can reach levels that are relevant for public health.食品中未申报过敏原的浓度可能达到与公众健康相关的水平。
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2010 Feb;27(2):169-74. doi: 10.1080/19440040903317513.
6
An integrated probabilistic framework for cumulative risk assessment of common mechanism chemicals in food: an example with organophosphorus pesticides.食品中常见作用机制化学品累积风险评估的综合概率框架:以有机磷农药为例。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2009 Jul;54(2):124-33. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.03.004. Epub 2009 Mar 20.
7
Food allergy guidelines and assessing allergic reaction risks: a regulatory perspective.食物过敏指南和评估过敏反应风险:监管视角。
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Jun;12(3):323-30. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e3283535aaf.
8
Thresholds of allergenic proteins in foods.食品中致敏蛋白的阈值。
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005 Sep 1;207(2 Suppl):152-6. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2005.01.028.
9
A model for probabilistic health impact assessment of exposure to food chemicals.暴露于食物化学物质的概率健康影响评估模型。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2009 Dec;47(12):2926-40. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.12.027. Epub 2008 Dec 27.
10
A retrospective analysis of allergic reaction severities and minimal eliciting doses for peanut, milk, egg, and soy oral food challenges.花生、牛奶、鸡蛋和大豆口服食物激发试验的过敏反应严重程度及最小激发剂量的回顾性分析。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2015 Jun;80:92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2015.02.023. Epub 2015 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Full range of population Eliciting Dose values for 14 priority allergenic foods and recommendations for use in risk characterization.14 种优先致敏性食物的全人群诱发性剂量值及在风险特征描述中应用的建议。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2020 Dec;146:111831. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111831. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
2
Frequentist and Bayesian approaches for food allergen risk assessment: risk outcome and uncertainty comparisons.频繁论者和贝叶斯方法在食物过敏原风险评估中的应用:风险结果和不确定性比较。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 3;9(1):18206. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54844-1.
3
Peanut Allergen Threshold Study (PATS): validation of eliciting doses using a novel single-dose challenge protocol.
花生过敏原阈值研究(PATS):使用新型单次剂量挑战方案验证激发剂量。
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2013 Sep 12;9(1):35. doi: 10.1186/1710-1492-9-35.
4
Double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges in children with alleged cow's milk allergy: prevention of unnecessary elimination diets and determination of eliciting doses.双盲安慰剂对照食物激发试验在疑似牛奶过敏患儿中的应用:预防不必要的饮食剔除和确定激发剂量。
Nutr J. 2013 Feb 8;12:22. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-12-22.
5
The Key Events Dose-Response Framework: a foundation for examining variability in elicitation thresholds for food allergens.关键事件剂量反应框架:用于研究食物过敏原激发阈值变异性的基础。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2009 Sep;49(8):729-39. doi: 10.1080/10408390903098707.