Kawato Mitsuo
ATR Computational Neuroscience Laboratories, Kyoto 619-0288, Japan.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Jun 27;363(1500):2201-14. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.2272.
Ten years have passed since the Japanese 'Century of the Brain' was promoted, and its most notable objective, the unique 'creating the brain' approach, has led us to apply a humanoid robot as a neuroscience tool. Here, we aim to understand the brain to the extent that we can make humanoid robots solve tasks typically solved by the human brain by essentially the same principles. I postulate that this 'Understanding the Brain by Creating the Brain' approach is the only way to fully understand neural mechanisms in a rigorous sense. Several humanoid robots and their demonstrations are introduced. A theory of cerebellar internal models and a systems biology model of cerebellar synaptic plasticity is discussed. Both models are experimentally supported, but the latter is more easily verifiable while the former is still controversial. I argue that the major reason for this difference is that essential information can be experimentally manipulated in molecular and cellular neuroscience while it cannot be manipulated at the system level. I propose a new experimental paradigm, manipulative neuroscience, to overcome this difficulty and allow us to prove cause-and-effect relationships even at the system level.
自日本推出“脑科学世纪”以来,十年过去了,其最显著的目标,即独特的“创造大脑”方法,已引领我们将仿人机器人用作神经科学工具。在此,我们旨在深入了解大脑,以便能够让仿人机器人遵循与人类大脑基本相同的原理来解决典型的人类大脑能解决的任务。我假定这种“通过创造大脑来理解大脑”的方法是从严格意义上全面理解神经机制的唯一途径。文中介绍了几种仿人机器人及其演示。还讨论了小脑内部模型理论和小脑突触可塑性的系统生物学模型。这两种模型都得到了实验支持,但后者更容易验证,而前者仍存在争议。我认为造成这种差异的主要原因是,在分子和细胞神经科学中,基本信息可以通过实验进行操控,而在系统层面则无法进行操控。我提出了一种新的实验范式——操纵性神经科学,以克服这一困难,使我们甚至在系统层面也能够证明因果关系。