Blatt Alison H, Titus Jehan, Chan Lewis
Urology Department, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
J Urol. 2008 Jun;179(6):2275-8; discussion 2278-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.118. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
Ultrasound measurement of bladder wall thickness has been proposed as a useful diagnostic parameter in patients with bladder outlet obstruction and other voiding dysfunctions. We assessed bladder wall thickness measurement as a noninvasive test in patients with suspected bladder outlet obstruction or overactive bladder syndrome.
Transabdominal ultrasound measurement of bladder wall thickness was performed during urodynamic study in 180 patients with nonneurogenic voiding dysfunction. Two measurements of anterior bladder wall thickness, 1 cm apart in the midline and averaged, were obtained at 200 ml filling. Bladder wall thickness findings were correlated with urodynamic diagnoses.
A total of 180 patients with an average age of 62 years (range 20 to 94) were recruited, comprising 73 males and 107 females. Of the patients 69 had normal urodynamics, 39 had bladder outlet obstruction, 38 had increased bladder sensation on cystometry and 34 had detrusor overactivity. Bladder wall thickness was 1.1 to 4.5 mm in all groups. Males had a slightly thicker bladder wall than females (mean 2.1 vs 1.9 mm, p = 0.064). Mean bladder wall thickness in patients with normal urodynamics, bladder outlet obstruction, detrusor overactivity and increased bladder sensation was 2.0, 2.1, 1.9 and 1.8 mm, respectively. No significant difference was found between the groups (ANOVA p = 0.064, not significant). In particular there was no difference in bladder wall thickness between patients with normal urodynamics, and those with bladder outlet obstruction (p = 0.31) or detrusor overactivity (p = 0.309).
Bladder wall thickness is remarkably uniform in patients with nonneurogenic voiding dysfunction. Therefore, it cannot reliably predict bladder outlet obstruction or detrusor overactivity. Bladder wall thickness measurement does not provide an alternative to urodynamic studies for diagnosing voiding dysfunction.
超声测量膀胱壁厚度已被提议作为膀胱出口梗阻及其他排尿功能障碍患者的一项有用诊断参数。我们评估了膀胱壁厚度测量作为疑似膀胱出口梗阻或膀胱过度活动症患者的一种非侵入性检查方法。
对180例非神经源性排尿功能障碍患者进行尿动力学检查时,经腹部超声测量膀胱壁厚度。在膀胱充盈至200 ml时,于中线处相隔1 cm测量膀胱前壁厚度两次,并取平均值。将膀胱壁厚度检查结果与尿动力学诊断结果进行关联分析。
共纳入180例患者,平均年龄62岁(范围20至94岁),其中男性73例,女性107例。患者中69例尿动力学正常,39例有膀胱出口梗阻,38例膀胱测压时膀胱感觉增强,34例有逼尿肌过度活动。所有组的膀胱壁厚度为1.1至4.5 mm。男性的膀胱壁略厚于女性(平均2.1 vs 1.9 mm,p = 0.064)。尿动力学正常、膀胱出口梗阻、逼尿肌过度活动及膀胱感觉增强患者的平均膀胱壁厚度分别为2.0、2.1、1.9和1.8 mm。各组间未发现显著差异(方差分析p = 0.064,无统计学意义)。特别是尿动力学正常的患者与膀胱出口梗阻患者(p = 0.31)或逼尿肌过度活动患者(p = 0.309)之间的膀胱壁厚度无差异。
非神经源性排尿功能障碍患者的膀胱壁厚度非常均匀。因此,它不能可靠地预测膀胱出口梗阻或逼尿肌过度活动。膀胱壁厚度测量不能替代尿动力学检查来诊断排尿功能障碍。