Kilcline Christine, Frieden Ilona J
Solano Dermatology Associates, Vallejo, California, USA.
Pediatr Dermatol. 2008 Mar-Apr;25(2):168-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2008.00626.x.
No published prospective studies have been published for several decades examining the incidence of hemangiomas. Older studies were performed before the delineation of "hemangiomas" from other vascular birthmarks was well-established. The objective of our study is to critically re-examine the literature reporting the incidence of infantile hemangiomas to determine if the true incidence is actually known. We performed both an electronic database search and hand search of the medical literature on the natural history of hemangiomas in full-term newborns and infants. A total of seven articles were found comprising two study populations: newborns <2 weeks of age and infants over the age of 2 weeks. All studies included samples sizes >500 patients including both hospital-based and primary care settings. Study designs ranged from retrospective chart reviews to cross-sectional cohort studies. Descriptive nomenclature was not uniform between studies, and all had methodologic limitations including problems of definition and study design. Studies estimating the true incidence of infantile hemangiomas are all many decades old and have significant methodologic issues limiting their ability to determine hemangioma incidence. Future studies in primary care settings using the currently accepted classification schema of vascular birthmarks may more accurately define the incidence and potential impact of this common vascular tumor of infancy.
几十年来,尚未发表过关于血管瘤发病率的前瞻性研究。早期研究是在“血管瘤”与其他血管性胎记的区分尚未明确确立之前进行的。我们研究的目的是批判性地重新审视报告婴儿血管瘤发病率的文献,以确定是否真的了解其实际发病率。我们对关于足月儿和婴儿血管瘤自然史的医学文献进行了电子数据库检索和手工检索。共发现七篇文章,包括两个研究人群:2周龄以下的新生儿和2周龄以上的婴儿。所有研究的样本量均超过500例患者,涵盖医院和初级保健机构。研究设计从回顾性病历审查到横断面队列研究不等。各研究之间的描述性命名并不统一,且均存在方法学局限性,包括定义和研究设计问题。估计婴儿血管瘤真实发病率的研究都有几十年历史了,且存在重大方法学问题,限制了它们确定血管瘤发病率的能力。未来在初级保健机构中使用当前公认的血管性胎记分类方案进行的研究,可能会更准确地界定这种常见婴儿期血管肿瘤的发病率及其潜在影响。