Suppr超能文献

加纳分娩费用豁免政策评估:两个地区分娩服务利用变化的人口估计

Evaluation of the delivery fee exemption policy in ghana: population estimates of changes in delivery service utilization in two regions.

作者信息

Penfold Suzanne, Harrison E, Bell Jacqueline, Fitzmaurice Ann

机构信息

Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, SE5 9RJ, UK.

出版信息

Ghana Med J. 2007 Sep;41(3):100-9.

Abstract

SUMMARY OBJECTIVES

To determine changes in the proportion of deliveries at health facilities and the proportion attended by health professionals after delivery fee exemption implementation.

DESIGN

Pre and post intervention implementation cluster-sampled household survey.

SETTING

Central and Volta regions of Ghana.

PARTICIPANTS

Women who had delivered in these regions during the fee exemption policy and an equivalent period of time prior to it.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Place of delivery and person attending.

RESULTS

After fee exemption implementation the likelihood of delivering in a health facility increased significantly in Central (OR 1.83, p<0.001) and Volta (OR 1.34, p<0.05) regions when accounting for the mothers' education and poverty levels and the clustered data. Results from Central Region showed increases in facility deliveries mainly occurred in health centres (from 13.7% to 22.3% of deliveries), and were attended by midwives (from 49.0% to 59.7%). There was evidence that after implementation some inequalities in the uptake of facility deliveries decreased. The greatest increase in the proportion of deliveries taking place in facilities occurred among women with the lowest levels of education (Central Region) and wealth (Volta Region). These changes reduced the differentials observed.

CONCLUSIONS

After the implementation of fee exemption the proportion of deliveries in health facilities increased in both regions. Although changes cannot be directly attributed to delivery fee exemption, results demonstrating that the greatest increases in facility-based deliveries occurred among the poorest and least educated women are consistent with the expectation that the policy would particularly benefit women with the greatest financial barrier to health care and at the greatest risk of maternal mortality.

摘要

摘要目的

确定实施分娩费用豁免后,医疗机构分娩比例以及产后由卫生专业人员护理的比例的变化情况。

设计

干预实施前后的整群抽样家庭调查。

地点

加纳中部和沃尔特地区。

参与者

在费用豁免政策实施期间以及此前同等时间段内在这些地区分娩的妇女。

主要观察指标

分娩地点和护理人员。

结果

实施费用豁免后,在考虑母亲的教育程度、贫困水平以及整群数据的情况下,中部地区(比值比1.83,p<0.001)和沃尔特地区(比值比1.34,p<0.05)在医疗机构分娩的可能性显著增加。中部地区的结果显示,医疗机构分娩的增加主要发生在保健中心(从分娩总数的13.7%增至22.3%),且由助产士护理(从49.0%增至59.7%)。有证据表明,实施后在利用医疗机构分娩方面的一些不平等现象有所减少。在设施内分娩比例增加最多的是教育程度最低(中部地区)和最贫困(沃尔特地区)的妇女。这些变化缩小了观察到的差异。

结论

实施费用豁免后,两个地区在医疗机构分娩的比例均有所增加。虽然这些变化不能直接归因于分娩费用豁免,但结果表明,在最贫困和受教育程度最低的妇女中,基于设施的分娩增加最多,这与该政策将特别惠及在获得医疗保健方面面临最大经济障碍且孕产妇死亡风险最高的妇女的预期一致。

相似文献

7
Two decades of maternity care fee exemption policies in Ghana: have they benefited the poor?
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Feb;31(1):46-55. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv017. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
8
Understanding factors influencing home delivery in the context of user-fee abolition in Northern Ghana: Evidence from 2014 DHS.
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019 Apr;34(2):727-743. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2731. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
10

引用本文的文献

2
Financing for equity for women's, children's and adolescents' health in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Sep 12;4(9):e0003573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003573. eCollection 2024.
4
Spatial distribution and factors associated with health insurance subscription among women in Ghana.
Int Health. 2024 Nov 4;16(6):610-624. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihad092.
5
Does a free maternity policy in Kenya work? Impact and cost-benefit consideration based on demographic health survey data.
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Feb;25(1):77-89. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01575-w. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
7
Are cesarean deliveries equitable in India: assessment using benefit incidence analysis.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 18;22(1):670. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07984-6.
8
Barriers to accessing healthcare among women in Ghana: a multilevel modelling.
BMC Public Health. 2020 Dec 17;20(1):1916. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10017-8.

本文引用的文献

1
The experience of Ghana in implementing a user fee exemption policy to provide free delivery care.
Reprod Health Matters. 2007 Nov;15(30):61-71. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(07)30325-X.
2
Impact on child mortality of removing user fees: simulation model.
BMJ. 2005 Oct 1;331(7519):747-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7519.747.
3
The impact of user fee exemption on service utilization and treatment seeking behaviour: the case of malaria in Sudan.
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2004 Oct-Dec;19 Suppl 1:S95-106. doi: 10.1002/hpm.777.
4
The familial technique for linking maternal death with poverty.
Lancet. 2004 Jan 3;363(9402):23-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15165-3.
5
Access to health care for all? User fees plus a Health Equity Fund in Sotnikum, Cambodia.
Health Policy Plan. 2004 Jan;19(1):22-32. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czh003.
6
Maternal mortality and access to obstetric services in West Africa.
Trop Med Int Health. 2003 Oct;8(10):940-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01111.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验