Keyes Katherine M, Hasin Deborah S
New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Addiction. 2008 Jul;103(7):1120-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02218.x. Epub 2008 May 20.
Epidemiological evidence indicates a positive relationship between income and the prevalence of alcohol abuse in the general population, but an inverse relationship between income and alcohol dependence. Among those with a diagnosis of alcohol abuse, the most prevalent criterion is hazardous use, which commonly requires sufficient resources to own or access a car. The present study investigated whether the association between income and the prevalence of current alcohol abuse is accounted for by the hazardous use criterion; specifically, the drinking and driving symptoms of the hazardous use criterion.
Face-to-face survey conducted in the 2001-02 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions, interviewed with the Alcohol Use Disorders and Associated Disabilities Interview 4th edition (AUDADIS-IV).
The United States and District of Columbia, including Alaska and Hawaii.
Household and group-quarters residents aged >18 years. Life-time dependence cases were excluded (n = 4781).
Income was defined as past-year personal income. Outcomes were specific alcohol abuse criteria and symptom questions. Logistic regressions were performed controlling for demographics. The relationship between alcohol abuse severity indicators and income was modeled using polytomous regression. Findings Among the alcohol abuse criteria, hazardous use is the most prevalent and the only criterion to have a significant positive relationship with income (F = 20.3, df = 3, P < 0.0001). Among the hazardous use symptoms, driving after drinking (F = 13.0, df = 3, P < 0.0001) and driving while drinking (F = 9.2, df = 3, P < 0.0001) were related positively to income.
Because hazardous use is the most commonly endorsed criterion of alcohol abuse, the link with income raises questions about whether the current alcohol abuse diagnosis can capture the full range of alcohol abusers in every socio-economic class. While many psychiatric disorders exhibit an inverse relationship with socio-economic status, a selection bias may cause the alcohol abuse diagnosis to have an artificially positive relationship with income due to the necessity for access to a vehicle to be diagnosed.
流行病学证据表明,在普通人群中,收入与酒精滥用患病率呈正相关,但与酒精依赖呈负相关。在被诊断为酒精滥用的人群中,最普遍的标准是危险使用,这通常需要有足够的资源来拥有或使用汽车。本研究调查了收入与当前酒精滥用患病率之间的关联是否由危险使用标准所解释;具体而言,是危险使用标准中的酒后驾车症状。
在2001 - 2002年全国酒精及相关疾病流行病学调查中进行面对面调查,采用酒精使用障碍及相关残疾访谈第4版(AUDADIS - IV)进行访谈。
美国及哥伦比亚特区,包括阿拉斯加和夏威夷。
年龄大于18岁的家庭及集体居住场所居民。排除终生依赖病例(n = 4781)。
收入定义为过去一年的个人收入。结果是特定的酒精滥用标准及症状问题。进行逻辑回归以控制人口统计学因素。使用多分类回归对酒精滥用严重程度指标与收入之间的关系进行建模。结果在酒精滥用标准中,危险使用是最普遍的,并且是与收入有显著正相关的唯一标准(F = 20.3,自由度 = 3,P < 0.0001)。在危险使用症状中,酒后驾车(F = 13.0,自由度 = 3,P < 0.0001)和饮酒时驾车(F = 9.2,自由度 = 3,P < 0.0001)与收入呈正相关。
由于危险使用是酒精滥用最常被认可的标准,其与收入的关联引发了关于当前酒精滥用诊断是否能够涵盖每个社会经济阶层中所有酒精滥用者的疑问。虽然许多精神疾病与社会经济地位呈负相关,但由于诊断需要有使用车辆的条件,选择偏倚可能导致酒精滥用诊断与收入呈现人为的正相关。