Lensvelt-Mulders Gerty, van der Hart Onno, van Ochten Jacobien M, van Son Maarten J M, Steele Kathy, Breeman Linda
Department of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, PO-Box 80140, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Oct;28(7):1138-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.03.006. Epub 2008 Mar 28.
A meta-analysis was performed on the empirical literature which addressed the relationship of peritraumatic dissociation to posttraumatic stress (PTS). Extensive literature searches were conducted to identify as many relevant studies as possible, and revealed 59 independent eligible studies. All studies were coded using a detailed code sheet that included effect measures, variables that indicated the methodological quality of the studies, and substantial variables that might theoretically affect the relationship between peritraumatic dissociation and PTS. A significant positive relation between peritraumatic dissociation and PTS was found. Differences in the methodological rigor between studies - time elapsed since peritraumatic dissociation, design, sample type, and study type - significantly and sufficiently explained the variability in effect sizes between studies. Theoretical variables did not explain such variability. Although results underline earlier findings, due to designs of the reviewed studies no conclusions could be drawn as to causal relations between peritraumatic dissociation and PTS.
对探讨创伤期间分离与创伤后应激(PTS)关系的实证文献进行了一项荟萃分析。进行了广泛的文献检索以识别尽可能多的相关研究,结果发现了59项独立的符合条件的研究。所有研究均使用详细的编码表进行编码,该编码表包括效应量、表明研究方法质量的变量,以及理论上可能影响创伤期间分离与PTS之间关系的实质性变量。研究发现创伤期间分离与PTS之间存在显著的正相关关系。研究之间在方法严谨性方面的差异——创伤期间分离后经过的时间、设计、样本类型和研究类型——显著且充分地解释了研究之间效应量的变异性。理论变量无法解释这种变异性。尽管结果强调了早期的发现,但由于所审查研究的设计,无法就创伤期间分离与PTS之间的因果关系得出结论。