• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于环境评价的联合分析——方法与应用综述

Conjoint analysis for environmental evaluation--a review of methods and applications.

作者信息

Alriksson Stina, Oberg Tomas

机构信息

University of Kalmar, School of Pure and Applied Natural Sciences, 391 82 Kalmar, Sweden.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2008 May;15(3):244-57. doi: 10.1065/espr2008.02.479.

DOI:10.1065/espr2008.02.479
PMID:18504844
Abstract

BACKGROUND, AIM AND SCOPE: Conjoint analysis and the related choice-modelling methods have been used for many years in marketing research to evaluate consumer behaviour and preferences for different kinds of product attributes. Recently, the number of applications in environmental science and management has started to grow. Conjoint analysis is found in many different forms, and the environmental studies evaluated in this review display the same range of methods as in other fields. The key characteristic of all these methods is that trade-offs are evaluated by jointly considering a number of important attributes.

MAIN FEATURES

This paper is a review of the literature on environmental applications of conjoint analysis and assesses in which environmental area conjoint analysis has been most successful. The method and the design of the studies are reviewed as well.

RESULTS

A total of 84 studies were found, dealing with environmental issues that were evaluated by conjoint analysis. The studies concern agriculture, ecosystem management, energy, environmental evaluation, forestry, land management, pollution, products, recreation, environmental risk analysis and waste management.

DISCUSSION

Choice experiments seem to have a comparatively stronger position in environmental studies than elsewhere. Most of the environmental applications are related to natural resource management. This is somewhat surprising, but a number of reports have appeared also on product evaluation, which could be a key application area in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to marketing and transportation, the number of environmental conjoint studies is rather small but increasing, and the method has proven to work effectively in eliciting preferences on environmental issues. In environmental issues, experimenters often use choice experiments, especially concerning ecosystem management and environmental evaluations. When it comes to evaluating preferences concerning agriculture, forestry, energy and products, a more traditional approach of conjoint analysis is favoured.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND PERSPECTIVES

Two new areas of application are identified in this review--environmental communication and expert elicitation. Conjoint analysis can thus be developed into a useful instrument for environmental risk analysis and communication, both of which are necessary for an efficient approach to risk governance.

摘要

背景、目的与范围:联合分析及相关的选择建模方法在市场研究中已应用多年,用于评估消费者对不同产品属性的行为和偏好。最近,其在环境科学与管理领域的应用数量开始增加。联合分析有多种不同形式,本综述中评估的环境研究展现出与其他领域相同的方法范围。所有这些方法的关键特征在于,通过共同考虑多个重要属性来评估权衡取舍。

主要特点

本文是对联合分析在环境应用方面的文献综述,并评估联合分析在哪些环境领域最为成功。同时也对研究方法和设计进行了综述。

结果

共找到84项研究,涉及通过联合分析评估的环境问题。这些研究涵盖农业、生态系统管理、能源、环境评估、林业、土地管理、污染、产品、娱乐、环境风险分析及废物管理。

讨论

选择实验在环境研究中似乎比在其他领域具有相对更强的地位。大多数环境应用与自然资源管理相关。这有点令人惊讶,但也出现了一些关于产品评估的报告,这可能是未来的一个关键应用领域。

结论

与市场营销和交通运输领域相比,环境联合研究的数量较少但在增加,并且该方法已被证明在引出对环境问题的偏好方面有效。在环境问题中,实验者经常使用选择实验,特别是在生态系统管理和环境评估方面。在评估对农业、林业、能源和产品的偏好时,更倾向于采用联合分析的传统方法。

建议与展望

本综述确定了两个新的应用领域——环境沟通和专家意见征集。因此,联合分析可发展成为环境风险分析和沟通的有用工具,这两者对于高效的风险治理方法都是必要的。

相似文献

1
Conjoint analysis for environmental evaluation--a review of methods and applications.用于环境评价的联合分析——方法与应用综述
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2008 May;15(3):244-57. doi: 10.1065/espr2008.02.479.
2
A conjoint analysis of landholder preferences for reward-based land-management contracts in Kapingazi watershed, Eastern Mount Kenya.肯尼亚东部山区卡平加齐流域基于奖励的土地管理合同中土地所有者偏好的联合分析。
J Environ Manage. 2011 Oct;92(10):2634-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
3
The Usability and Feasibility of Conjoint Analysis to Elicit Preferences for Distal Radius Fractures in Patients 55 Years and Older.联合分析在55岁及以上患者中引出桡骨远端骨折偏好的可用性和可行性
J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Oct;44(10):846-852. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
4
Online Healthy Food Experiments: Capturing Complexity by Using Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis.在线健康食品实验:运用基于选择的联合分析捕捉复杂性
Behav Anal. 2017 Oct 2;40(2):373-391. doi: 10.1007/s40614-017-0114-9. eCollection 2017 Nov.
5
Can patients diagnosed with schizophrenia complete choice-based conjoint analysis tasks?精神分裂症患者能否完成基于选择的联合分析任务?
Patient. 2011;4(4):267-75. doi: 10.2165/11589190-000000000-00000.
6
Vaccine preferences driving vaccine-decision making of different target groups: a systematic review of choice-based experiments.疫苗偏好驱动不同目标群体的疫苗决策:基于选择的实验系统评价。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 28;21(1):879. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06398-9.
7
Pros and cons of conjoint analysis of discrete choice experiments to define classification and response criteria in rheumatology.离散选择实验联合分析在风湿病学中定义分类和反应标准的利弊。
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2016 Mar;28(2):117-21. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000259.
8
Conjoint analysis: using a market-based research model for healthcare decision making.联合分析:使用基于市场的研究模型进行医疗保健决策。
Nurs Res. 2008 May-Jun;57(3):220-4. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000319499.52122.d2.
9
Factors Associated with Pediatric Dentists' Choice of Amalgam: Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis Approach.与儿科牙医选择汞合金相关的因素:基于选择的联合分析方法。
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2019 Jul;4(3):246-254. doi: 10.1177/2380084418822977. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
10
Quantifying benefit-risk preferences for medical interventions: an overview of a growing empirical literature.量化医疗干预措施的获益-风险偏好:日益增长的实证文献概述。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Aug;11(4):319-29. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0028-y.

引用本文的文献

1
The relative importance of servicescape in fitness center for facility improvement.服务场景在健身中心设施改善中的相对重要性。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 15;10(9):e29562. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29562. eCollection 2024 May 15.
2
Important factors for public acceptance of the final disposal of contaminated soil and wastes resulting from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station accident.公众对福岛第一核电站事故污染土壤和废物最终处置的接受的重要因素。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 22;17(6):e0269702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269702. eCollection 2022.
3
Conjoint Analysis: A Research Method to Study Patients' Preferences and Personalize Care.

本文引用的文献

1
Conjoint analysis: a useful tool for assessing preferences for environmental issues.联合分析:评估对环境问题偏好的有用工具。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2008 Mar;15(2):119. doi: 10.1065/espr2007.12.460.
2
Applying choice experiments to valuing the different types of environmental issues in Japan.运用选择实验法评估日本不同类型的环境问题。
J Environ Manage. 2007 Aug;84(3):362-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.025.
3
Estimating the public preferences for solid waste management programmes using choice experiments in Macao.
联合分析:一种研究患者偏好并实现个性化护理的研究方法。
J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 13;12(2):274. doi: 10.3390/jpm12020274.
4
Application of Conjoint Analysis to Improve Reliability of Dietician Consultation in Pediatric Celiac Disease.联合分析在提高小儿乳糜泻营养师咨询可靠性中的应用
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2017 Jun 13;2(4):e029. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000029. eCollection 2017 Jul-Aug.
5
Assessing the external benefits of contaminated soil remediation in Korea: a choice experiment study.评估韩国污染土壤修复的外部效益:基于选择实验的研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Jun;25(17):17216-17222. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2220-y. Epub 2018 May 19.
6
Valuation of mortality risk attributable to climate change: investigating the effect of survey administration modes on a VSL.气候变化导致的死亡率估值:调查调查管理模式对 VSL 的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012 Dec 18;9(12):4760-81. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9124760.
7
Developing and validating a model to predict the success of an IHCS implementation: the Readiness for Implementation Model.开发和验证一个预测 IHCS 实施成功的模型:实施准备度模型。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):707-13. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.005546.
运用选择实验法评估澳门公众对固体废物管理方案的偏好
Waste Manag Res. 2006 Aug;24(4):301-9. doi: 10.1177/0734242X06064977.
4
Using economic valuation techniques to inform water resources management: a survey and critical appraisal of available techniques and an application.运用经济评估技术为水资源管理提供信息:对现有技术的调查与批判性评估及一项应用
Sci Total Environ. 2006 Jul 15;365(1-3):105-22. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.02.032. Epub 2006 May 2.
5
Using choice experiments to assess people's preferences for railway transports of hazardous materials.运用选择实验评估人们对危险物品铁路运输的偏好。
Risk Anal. 2005 Oct;25(5):1199-214. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00660.x.
6
Estimating the economic value of improvements in river ecology using choice experiments: an application to the water framework directive.运用选择实验法评估河流生态改善的经济价值:以水框架指令为例
J Environ Manage. 2006 Jan;78(2):183-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.05.001. Epub 2005 Aug 22.
7
An estimation of the social costs of landfill siting using a choice experiment.运用选择实验法对垃圾填埋场选址的社会成本进行评估。
Waste Manag. 2004;24(8):753-62. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2004.05.003.
8
Evaluating the multiple benefits of marine water quality improvements: how important are health risk reductions?评估改善海洋水质的多重益处:降低健康风险有多重要?
J Environ Manage. 2002 Jul;65(3):239-50. doi: 10.1006/jema.2002.0531.
9
The use of choice experiments in the analysis of tourist preferences for ecotourism development in Costa Rica.选择实验在分析哥斯达黎加生态旅游发展的游客偏好中的应用。
J Environ Manage. 2002 Jun;65(2):153-63. doi: 10.1006/jema.2001.0541.
10
Environmental value transfer: an application for the South East Queensland waterways.环境价值转移:在昆士兰东南部水道的应用
Water Sci Technol. 2002;45(11):91-100.