Tipke Maike, Diallo Salou, Coulibaly Boubacar, Störzinger Dominic, Hoppe-Tichy Torsten, Sie Ali, Müller Olaf
Department of Tropical Hygiene and Public Health, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Malar J. 2008 May 27;7:95. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-7-95.
There is concern about an increasing infiltration of markets by substandard and fake medications against life-threatening diseases in developing countries. This is particularly worrying with regard to the increasing resistance development of Plasmodium falciparum against affordable anti-malarial medications, which has led to a change to more expensive drugs in most endemic countries.
A representative sample of modern anti-malarial medications from licensed (public and private pharmacies, community health workers) and illicit (market and street vendors, shops) sources has been collected in the Nouna Health District in north-western Burkina Faso in 2006. All drugs were tested for their quality with the standard procedures of the German Pharma Health Fund-Minilab. Detected low standard drugs were re-tested with European Pharmacopoeia 2.9.1 standards for disintegration and ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy at the laboratory of the Heidelberg University for confirmation.
Overall, 86 anti-malarial drug samples were collected, of which 77 samples have been included in the final analysis. The sample consisted of 39/77 (50%) chloroquine, 10/77 (13%) pyrimethamine-sulphadoxine, 9/77 (12%) quinine, 6/77 (8%) amodiaquine, 9/77 (12%) artesunate, and 4/77 (5%) artemether-lumefantrine. 32/77 (42%) drug samples were found to be of poor quality, of which 28 samples failed the visual inspection, nine samples had substandard concentrations of the active ingredient, four samples showed poor disintegration, and one sample contained non of the stated active ingredient. The licensed and the illicit market contributed 5/47 (10.6%) and 27/30 (90.0%) samples of substandard drugs respectively.
These findings provide further evidence for the wide-spread existence of substandard anti-malarial medications in Africa and call for strengthening of the regulatory and quality control capacity of affected countries, particularly in view of the now wider available and substantially more costly artemisinin-based combination therapies.
人们担心在发展中国家,针对危及生命疾病的不合格和假冒药品对市场的渗透日益增加。鉴于恶性疟原虫对负担得起的抗疟药物的耐药性不断增强,这尤其令人担忧,在大多数疟疾流行国家,这已导致转而使用更昂贵的药物。
2006年在布基纳法索西北部的努纳健康区,从有许可证的(公立和私立药店、社区卫生工作者)和非法的(市场和街头小贩、商店)来源收集了具有代表性的现代抗疟药物样本。所有药物都按照德国制药健康基金微型实验室的标准程序进行质量检测。检测出的低标准药物在海德堡大学实验室按照欧洲药典2.9.1的崩解标准和紫外-可见光谱法进行重新检测以确认。
总共收集了86份抗疟药物样本,其中77份样本纳入最终分析。样本包括39/77(50%)氯喹、10/77(13%)乙胺嘧啶-磺胺多辛、9/77(12%)奎宁、6/77(8%)阿莫地喹、9/77(12%)青蒿琥酯以及4/77(5%)蒿甲醚-本芴醇。32/77(42%)的药物样本被发现质量不佳,其中28份样本目视检查不合格,9份样本活性成分浓度不达标,4份样本崩解性差,1份样本不含所述活性成分。有许可证的市场和非法市场分别提供了5/47(10.6%)和27/30(90.0%)的不合格药物样本。
这些发现为非洲存在广泛的不合格抗疟药物提供了进一步证据,并呼吁加强受影响国家的监管和质量控制能力,特别是鉴于目前青蒿素类复方疗法的可得性更高且成本大幅增加。