Small David Marc, Simons Anne D, Yovanoff Paul, Silva Susan G, Lewis Cara C, Murakami Jessica L, March John
Psychology Department, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97401-1227, USA.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2008 Oct;36(7):1015-28. doi: 10.1007/s10802-008-9237-5. Epub 2008 May 29.
Patterns and correlates of comorbidity, as well as differences in manifest depressive profiles were investigated in a sample of depressed adolescents. A sub-sample of the youth were characterized as belonging to either a Pure depression group, an Internalizing group (depression and co-occurring internalizing disorders), or an Externalizing group (depression and co-occurring externalizing disorders). Item response theory (IRT) and differential item functioning (DIF) were used to assess whether the depressed adolescents from the different comorbidity groups presented with different depressive symptoms. Results indicated that the comorbidity groups were meaningfully distinct in terms of psychosocial correlates as well as showed differences in depressive symptom profiles as informed by DIF analyses. In particular, the comorbidity groups differed in terms of presentation of psychomotor changes and cognitive impairments. Implications for assessment are discussed.
在一组抑郁青少年样本中,研究了共病模式及其相关因素,以及明显抑郁特征的差异。青少年子样本被分为纯抑郁组、内化组(抑郁伴发内化障碍)或外化组(抑郁伴发外化障碍)。采用项目反应理论(IRT)和项目功能差异(DIF)来评估不同共病组的抑郁青少年是否表现出不同的抑郁症状。结果表明,共病组在心理社会相关因素方面存在显著差异,并且在DIF分析显示的抑郁症状特征上也存在差异。特别是,共病组在精神运动变化和认知障碍的表现方面存在差异。文中讨论了评估的意义。