Papadakis Maxine A, Arnold Gerald K, Blank Linda L, Holmboe Eric S, Lipner Rebecca S
University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jun 3;148(11):869-76. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-11-200806030-00009.
Physicians who are disciplined by state licensing boards are more likely to have demonstrated unprofessional behavior in medical school. Information is limited on whether similar performance measures taken during residency can predict performance as practicing physicians.
To determine whether performance measures during residency predict the likelihood of future disciplinary actions against practicing internists.
Retrospective cohort study.
State licensing board disciplinary actions against physicians from 1990 to 2006.
66,171 physicians who entered internal medicine residency training in the United States from 1990 to 2000 and became diplomates.
Predictor variables included components of the Residents' Annual Evaluation Summary ratings and American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) certification examination scores.
2 performance measures independently predicted disciplinary action. A low professionalism rating on the Residents' Annual Evaluation Summary predicted increased risk for disciplinary action (hazard ratio, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.3 to 2.2]), and high performance on the ABIM certification examination predicted decreased risk for disciplinary action (hazard ratio, 0.7 [CI, 0.60 to 0.70] for American or Canadian medical school graduates and 0.9 [CI, 0.80 to 1.0] for international medical school graduates). Progressively better professionalism ratings and ABIM certification examination scores were associated with less risk for subsequent disciplinary actions; the risk ranged from 4.0% for the lowest professionalism rating to 0.5% for the highest and from 2.5% for the lowest examination scores to 0.0% for the highest.
The study was retrospective. Some diplomates may have practiced outside of the United States. Nondiplomates were excluded.
Poor performance on behavioral and cognitive measures during residency are associated with greater risk for state licensing board actions against practicing physicians at every point on a performance continuum. These findings support the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education standards for professionalism and cognitive performance and the development of best practices to remediate these deficiencies.
受到州执照颁发委员会处分的医生在医学院时更有可能表现出不专业行为。关于住院医师培训期间采取的类似绩效指标能否预测执业医师的表现,相关信息有限。
确定住院医师培训期间的绩效指标能否预测未来针对执业内科医生的纪律处分可能性。
回顾性队列研究。
1990年至2006年州执照颁发委员会对医生的纪律处分。
1990年至2000年在美国进入内科住院医师培训并获得专科医师资格证书的66171名医生。
预测变量包括住院医师年度评估总结评分的组成部分以及美国内科医学委员会(ABIM)认证考试成绩。
两项绩效指标可独立预测纪律处分。住院医师年度评估总结中专业精神评分低预示着纪律处分风险增加(风险比,1.7[95%CI,1.3至2.2]),而ABIM认证考试成绩高预示着纪律处分风险降低(美国或加拿大医学院毕业生的风险比为0.7[CI,0.60至0.70],国际医学院毕业生的风险比为0.9[CI,0.80至1.0])。专业精神评分和ABIM认证考试成绩逐步提高与后续纪律处分风险降低相关;风险范围从专业精神评分最低者的4.0%到最高者的0.5%,考试成绩最低者的2.5%到最高者的0.0%。
该研究为回顾性研究。一些专科医师资格证书持有者可能在美国境外执业。未获得专科医师资格证书者被排除在外。
住院医师培训期间行为和认知指标表现不佳与州执照颁发委员会针对执业医师采取行动的风险增加相关,在绩效连续体的每个点上都是如此。这些发现支持毕业后医学教育认证委员会关于专业精神和认知表现的标准以及弥补这些不足的最佳实践的发展。