Suppr超能文献

基于社区的康复计划:进行监测和评估以衡量结果。

Community based rehabilitation programmes: monitoring and evaluation in order to measure results.

作者信息

Cornielje Huib, Velema Johan P, Finkenflügel Harry

机构信息

Enablement, Langenhorst 36, 2402PX Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Lepr Rev. 2008 Mar;79(1):36-49.

Abstract

Although Community Based Rehabilitation has now formally existed for almost 30 years, few papers have been written about the results of this approach. The authors hope to contribute with this paper towards methodologies that will help to measure results of Community Based Rehabilitation programmes. The importance of establishing--prior to the development of Community Based Rehabilitation--an extensive baseline has not been extensively covered as the importance of it is almost self-evident; yet the lack of baseline data often severely hampers the possibility of being able to measure the effects of Community Based Rehabilitation. The article places considerable importance on management information systems and monitoring, since it is believed that evaluation will greatly benefit from both the existence of baseline data as well as a well-developed and well-implemented information system. The present article emphasises the need for participatory processes in the development of baseline data and information systems. Four key areas for measuring CBR are highlighted: people, power, public society and partnerships. Finally, a tool is presented in order to evaluate (or monitoring and evaluation) systematically. What gets measured gets done; If you don't measure results, you can't tell success from failure; If you can't see success, you can't reward it; If you can't reward success, you're probably rewarding failure; If you can't see success, you can't learn from it; If you can't recognize failure, you can't correct it; If you can demonstrate results, you can win public support.

摘要

尽管基于社区的康复现已正式存在近30年,但关于这种方法的成果的论文却很少。作者希望通过本文为有助于衡量基于社区的康复项目成果的方法做出贡献。在基于社区的康复发展之前建立广泛基线的重要性尚未得到广泛探讨,因为其重要性几乎不言而喻;然而,缺乏基线数据往往严重阻碍了衡量基于社区的康复效果的可能性。本文非常重视管理信息系统和监测,因为据信评估将极大地受益于基线数据的存在以及完善且实施良好的信息系统。本文强调在基线数据和信息系统的开发中需要参与性过程。突出了衡量社区康复的四个关键领域:人员、权力、公民社会和伙伴关系。最后,介绍了一种用于系统评估(或监测与评估)的工具。被衡量的事情才能完成;如果不衡量结果,就无法区分成功与失败;如果看不到成功,就无法奖励它;如果无法奖励成功,那可能就是在奖励失败;如果看不到成功,就无法从中学习;如果认不出失败,就无法纠正它;如果能展示结果,就能赢得公众支持。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验