Kramer Holly, Palmas Walter, Kestenbaum Bryan, Cushman Mary, Allison Matt, Astor Brad, Shlipak Michael
Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Loyola Medical Center, 2160 First Avenue, Maywood, IL 60153, USA.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Sep;3(5):1391-7. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04160907. Epub 2008 Jun 11.
Muscle mass is not a major determinant of serum cystatin C levels, and its use to estimate GFR may lead to more congruent estimates of chronic kidney disease (CKD) across gender and racial/ethnic groups.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis is a population-based study of 6814 men and women who are aged 45 to 85 yr and do not have clinical cardiovascular disease. Estimated CKD prevalence, defined as an estimated GFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) body surface area, was compared using three different GFR prediction equations: The abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation and two equations based on serum cystatin C.
Among women, CKD prevalence estimates across the four racial/ethnic groups using the MDRD- or the cystatin C-based GFR equations, which include gender and race coefficients, varied by approximately two-fold (P < 0.0001) but were more congruent with use of a serum cystatin C-based equation without the use of coefficients (P = 0.3). CKD prevalence estimates did not differ significantly across racial/ethnic groups among men with the MDRD (P = 0.07) or cystatin C formula without coefficients (P = 0.05) but did differ significantly with the cystatin C formula, which incorporates gender and race coefficients (P = 0.006).
CKD prevalence estimates vary across racial/ethnic groups, and the degree of variability depends on the method used to estimate GFR, especially among women. Further research is needed to determine the accuracy and precision of GFR prediction equations in racially diverse populations.
肌肉量并非血清胱抑素C水平的主要决定因素,使用其来估算肾小球滤过率(GFR)可能会使不同性别和种族/族裔群体对慢性肾脏病(CKD)的估算更为一致。
设计、地点、参与者与测量:动脉粥样硬化多民族研究是一项基于人群的研究,纳入了6814名年龄在45至85岁且无临床心血管疾病的男性和女性。使用三种不同的GFR预测方程比较了估算的CKD患病率,定义为估算的GFR<60 ml/(min·1.73 m²)体表面积:简化的肾脏病饮食改良(MDRD)方程以及两个基于血清胱抑素C的方程。
在女性中,使用包含性别和种族系数的MDRD或基于胱抑素C的GFR方程,四个种族/族裔群体的CKD患病率估算值相差约两倍(P<0.0001),但使用不包含系数的基于血清胱抑素C的方程时估算更为一致(P = 0.3)。在男性中,使用MDRD方程(P = 0.07)或不包含系数的胱抑素C公式(P = 0.05)时,各种族/族裔群体的CKD患病率估算值无显著差异,但使用包含性别和种族系数的胱抑素C公式时差异显著(P = 0.006)。
不同种族/族裔群体的CKD患病率估算值存在差异,差异程度取决于估算GFR的方法,尤其是在女性中。需要进一步研究以确定GFR预测方程在不同种族人群中的准确性和精确性。