• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胰腺手术患者的围手术期管理:麻醉医生的观点

Perioperative management in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery: the anesthesiologist's point of view.

作者信息

Marandola M, Cilli T, Alessandri F, Tellan G, Caronna R, Chirletti P, Delogu G

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Therapy, La Sapienza University-Azienda Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2008 May;40(4):1195-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.03.114.

DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.03.114
PMID:18555147
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A high rate of mortality and morbidity has been associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy; the 5-year survival rate is 15% to 25% compared with 1% to 5% among those who did not have any cancer-directed treatment. Systemic rather than surgical complications cause the majority of perioperative deaths, so the anesthesiologist has a crucial role in the management of these patients. This work sought to evaluate an improved approach to perioperative pain management, postsurgical complications as well as outcomes.

PATIENTS

From 2002 to 2007, 40 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary cancer. The anesthesia protocol was standardized for postoperative pain control. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: 16 patients received an epidural analgesia with local anesthetics combined with opioids (T(9)-T(10); group A) and 24 had IV analgesia with morphine (group B).

RESULTS

Postoperative mortality was 2.5%. With regard to complications we observed 4 biliary fistulas, 2 pancreatic fistulas with spontaneous healing in one patient and death in the other as well as wound infections. Patients treated with epidural analgesia experienced better pain relief, compared with subjects receiving IV analgesia, which demonstrated a higher incidence of opioid-related adverse effects such as sedation and respiratory depression.

CONCLUSION

Adequate perioperative treatment included suitable nutritional support and pain management using loco-regional techniques, which seem to improve the surgical outcomes among pancreatic cancer patients.

摘要

背景

胰十二指肠切除术与高死亡率和发病率相关;5年生存率为15%至25%,而未接受任何针对癌症治疗的患者5年生存率为1%至5%。围手术期死亡大多由全身并发症而非手术并发症导致,因此麻醉医生在这些患者的管理中起着关键作用。这项研究旨在评估一种改进的围手术期疼痛管理方法、术后并发症及治疗结果。

患者

2002年至2007年,40例患者因胰腺癌或壶腹周围癌接受了胰十二指肠切除术。术后疼痛控制的麻醉方案标准化。患者被随机分为两组:16例患者接受硬膜外局部麻醉药联合阿片类药物镇痛(T9 - T10;A组),24例接受静脉注射吗啡镇痛(B组)。

结果

术后死亡率为2.5%。关于并发症,我们观察到4例胆瘘、2例胰瘘,其中1例患者自行愈合,另1例死亡,还有伤口感染。与接受静脉镇痛的患者相比,接受硬膜外镇痛的患者疼痛缓解更好,静脉镇痛组阿片类药物相关不良反应如镇静和呼吸抑制的发生率更高。

结论

充分的围手术期治疗包括适当的营养支持和使用局部区域技术进行疼痛管理,这似乎能改善胰腺癌患者的手术治疗结果。

相似文献

1
Perioperative management in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery: the anesthesiologist's point of view.胰腺手术患者的围手术期管理:麻醉医生的观点
Transplant Proc. 2008 May;40(4):1195-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.03.114.
2
Effects of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with buprenorphine and morphine alone and in combination during the first 12 postoperative hours: a randomized, double-blind, four-arm trial in adults undergoing abdominal surgery.术后12小时内单独及联合使用丁丙诺啡和吗啡静脉自控镇痛的效果:一项针对接受腹部手术的成年人的随机、双盲、四臂试验。
Clin Ther. 2009 Mar;31(3):527-41. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.03.018.
3
Does intraoperative radiation therapy improve local tumor control in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma? A propensity score analysis.术中放疗能否改善接受胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺腺癌患者的局部肿瘤控制?一项倾向评分分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Aug;16(8):2116-22. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0498-1. Epub 2009 May 13.
4
Subtenon block compared to intravenous fentanyl for perioperative analgesia in pediatric cataract surgery.在小儿白内障手术中,与静脉注射芬太尼相比,球后阻滞用于围手术期镇痛的效果比较
Anesth Analg. 2009 Apr;108(4):1132-8. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318198a3fd.
5
Negligible effect of selective preoperative biliary drainage on perioperative resuscitation, morbidity, and mortality in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.选择性术前胆道引流对接受胰十二指肠切除术患者围手术期复苏、发病率和死亡率的影响可忽略不计。
Arch Surg. 2009 Sep;144(9):841-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.152.
6
Incisional continuous fascia iliaca block provides more effective pain relief and fewer side effects than opioids after pelvic osteotomy in children.与阿片类药物相比,切口连续髂筋膜阻滞在儿童骨盆截骨术后能提供更有效的疼痛缓解且副作用更少。
Anesth Analg. 2009 Dec;109(6):1799-803. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181bbc41a.
7
A survey of combined epidural-propofol anesthesia with noninvasive positive pressure ventilation as a minimally invasive anesthetic protocol.一项关于联合硬膜外-丙泊酚麻醉与无创正压通气作为一种微创麻醉方案的调查。
Med Sci Monit. 2003 Jul;9(7):CR316-23.
8
Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for postoperative pain control after lumbar spine surgery.腰椎手术后用于术后疼痛控制的患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)。
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2008 Oct;20(4):256-60. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e31817ffe90.
9
Seven years experience of pancreaticoduodenectomy at Sawanpracharak Hospital.沙万普拉查拉克医院七年胰十二指肠切除术经验
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Jul;91(7):1043-50.
10
A pancreaticoduodenectomy is acceptable for periampullary tumors in the elderly, even in patients over 80 years of age.胰十二指肠切除术对于老年壶腹周围肿瘤患者是可行的,即使是80岁以上的患者。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(5):675-80. doi: 10.1007/s00534-009-0106-6. Epub 2009 Apr 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Analgesic Modalities in Patients Undergoing Open Pancreatoduodenectomy-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.接受开放性胰十二指肠切除术患者的镇痛方式——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 14;12(14):4682. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144682.
2
Sublingual Sufentanil versus Standard-of-Care (Patient-Controlled Analgesia with Epidural Ropivacaine/Sufentanil or Intravenous Morphine) for Postoperative Pain Following Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Randomized Trial.胰十二指肠切除术后疼痛的舌下含服舒芬太尼与标准治疗(硬膜外罗哌卡因/舒芬太尼患者自控镇痛或静脉注射吗啡)的随机对照试验
J Pain Res. 2022 Jun 22;15:1775-1786. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S363545. eCollection 2022.
3
Postoperative Pain Relief after Pancreatic Resection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Analgesic Modalities.
胰腺切除术后的疼痛缓解:镇痛方式的系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2021 Oct;45(10):3165-3173. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06217-x. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
4
Epidural Analgesia Is Associated with Prolonged Length of Stay After Open HPB Surgery in Over 27,000 Patients.硬膜外镇痛与超过 27000 例开腹肝胆手术患者术后住院时间延长相关。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Jul;25(7):1716-1726. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04751-y. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
5
Propofol-based intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in pancreatic cancer surgery.丙泊酚静脉麻醉与地氟烷麻醉相比,可提高胰腺癌手术患者的生存率。
PLoS One. 2020 May 21;15(5):e0233598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233598. eCollection 2020.
6
Propofol inhibits migration and induces apoptosis of pancreatic cancer PANC-1 cells through miR-34a-mediated E-cadherin and LOC285194 signals.异丙酚通过 miR-34a 介导的 E-钙黏蛋白和 LOC285194 信号抑制胰腺癌 PANC-1 细胞的迁移并诱导其凋亡。
Bioengineered. 2020 Dec;11(1):510-521. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2020.1754038.
7
Meta-analysis of epidural analgesia in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy.硬膜外镇痛在胰十二指肠切除术患者中的荟萃分析。
BJS Open. 2019 Apr 29;3(5):559-571. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50171. eCollection 2019 Oct.
8
Epidural and Non-epidural Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Open Pancreatectomy: a Retrospective Cohort Study.开腹胰切除术患者的硬膜外和非硬膜外镇痛:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Dec;23(12):2439-2448. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04136-w. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
9
The NAPRESSIM trial: the use of low-dose, prophylactic naloxone infusion to prevent respiratory depression with intrathecally administered morphine in elective hepatobiliary surgery: a study protocol and statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled trial.NAPRESSIM试验:在择期肝胆手术中使用低剂量预防性纳洛酮输注预防鞘内注射吗啡所致呼吸抑制:一项随机对照试验的研究方案和统计分析计划
Trials. 2017 Dec 29;18(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2370-0.
10
Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens for postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, vomiting and pain after abdominal surgery.硬膜外局部麻醉药与阿片类镇痛方案用于腹部手术后胃肠道麻痹、呕吐及疼痛的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 16;7(7):CD001893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001893.pub2.