Bonett Douglas G
Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Psychol Methods. 2008 Jun;13(2):99-109. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.13.2.99.
Most psychology journals now require authors to report a sample value of effect size along with hypothesis testing results. The sample effect size value can be misleading because it contains sampling error. Authors often incorrectly interpret the sample effect size as if it were the population effect size. A simple solution to this problem is to report a confidence interval for the population value of the effect size. Standardized linear contrasts of means are useful measures of effect size in a wide variety of research applications. New confidence intervals for standardized linear contrasts of means are developed and may be applied to between-subjects designs, within-subjects designs, or mixed designs. The proposed confidence interval methods are easy to compute, do not require equal population variances, and perform better than the currently available methods when the population variances are not equal.
现在,大多数心理学杂志要求作者在报告假设检验结果的同时,报告效应量的样本值。样本效应量值可能会产生误导,因为它包含抽样误差。作者常常错误地将样本效应量解释为总体效应量。解决这个问题的一个简单方法是报告效应量总体值的置信区间。均值的标准化线性对比是各种研究应用中效应量的有用度量。本文开发了均值标准化线性对比的新置信区间,并可应用于组间设计、组内设计或混合设计。所提出的置信区间方法易于计算,不需要总体方差相等,并且在总体方差不相等时,比现有方法表现更好。