Choi BongKyoo, Kawakami Norito, Chang SeiJin, Koh SangBaek, Bjorner Jakob, Punnett Laura, Karasek Robert
Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts 01854, USA.
Int J Behav Med. 2008;15(2):120-32. doi: 10.1080/10705500801929742.
The five-item psychological demands scale of the Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ) has been assumed to be one-dimensional in practice.
To examine whether the scale has sufficient internal consistency and external validity to be treated as a single scale, using the cross-national JCQ datasets from the United States, Korea, and Japan.
Exploratory factor analyses with 22 JCQ items, confirmatory factor analyses with the five psychological demands items, and correlations analyses with mental health indexes.
Generally, exploratory factor analyses displayed the predicted demand/control/support structure with three and four factors extracted. However, at more detailed levels of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, the demands scale showed clear evidence of multi-factor structure. The correlations of items and subscales of the demands scale with mental health indexes were similar to those of the full scale in the Korean and Japanese datasets, but not in the U.S. data. In 4 out of 16 sub-samples of the U.S. data, several significant correlations of the components of the demands scale with job dissatisfaction and life dissatisfaction were obscured by the full scale.
The multidimensionality of the psychological demands scale should be considered in psychometric analysis and interpretation, occupational epidemiologic studies, and future scale extension.
工作内容问卷(JCQ)的五项心理需求量表在实际应用中被假定为单维量表。
使用来自美国、韩国和日本的跨国JCQ数据集,检验该量表是否具有足够的内部一致性和外部效度,以被视为一个单一量表。
对22个JCQ项目进行探索性因素分析,对五个心理需求项目进行验证性因素分析,并与心理健康指标进行相关性分析。
总体而言,探索性因素分析显示出预测的需求/控制/支持结构,提取出了三个和四个因素。然而,在更详细的探索性和验证性因素分析层面,需求量表显示出明显的多因素结构证据。需求量表的项目和子量表与心理健康指标的相关性在韩国和日本的数据集中与完整量表相似,但在美国数据中并非如此。在美国数据的16个子样本中的4个中,需求量表各成分与工作不满意和生活不满意之间的若干显著相关性被完整量表掩盖了。
在心理测量分析与解释、职业流行病学研究以及未来量表扩展中,应考虑心理需求量表的多维性。