Chadwick Paul, Hember Martin, Symes Janette, Peters Emmanuelle, Kuipers Elizabeth, Dagnan Dave
Department of Psychiatry, Royal South Hants Hospital, Southampton, UK.
Br J Clin Psychol. 2008 Nov;47(Pt 4):451-5. doi: 10.1348/014466508X314891. Epub 2008 Jun 20.
To assess the reliability and validity of the Southampton mindfulness questionnaire (SMQ), a 16-item measure of mindful awareness of distressing thoughts and images.
A total of 256 people participated, comprising a non-clinical community sample of 134 (83 meditators and 51 non-meditators) and a clinical sample of 122 people with a current distressing psychosis. To assess concurrent validity, non-clinical participants and half clinical participants (total 197 participants) completed the mindful attention awareness scale (MAAS). Predicted links were assessed with affect, and 59 patients completed a validated measure to assess link between mindfulness and intensity of 'delusional' experience.
The scale has a single factor structure, was internally reliable, significantly correlated with the MAAS, showed expected associations with affect, and distinguished among meditators, non-meditators and people with psychosis.
The data support use of the SMQ in clinical practice and research to assess mindful responding to distressing thoughts and images.
评估南安普敦正念问卷(SMQ)的信效度,这是一项用于测量对痛苦想法和意象的正念觉察的包含16个条目的量表。
共有256人参与,包括134人的非临床社区样本(83名冥想者和51名非冥想者)以及122名患有当前痛苦性精神病的临床样本。为评估同时效度,非临床参与者和一半临床参与者(共197名参与者)完成了正念注意力觉察量表(MAAS)。通过情感评估预测的关联,59名患者完成了一项经过验证的测量,以评估正念与“妄想”体验强度之间的关联。
该量表具有单一因素结构,内部可靠,与MAAS显著相关,显示出与情感的预期关联,并能区分冥想者、非冥想者和精神病患者。
数据支持在临床实践和研究中使用SMQ来评估对痛苦想法和意象的正念反应。