Suppr超能文献

对不愉快的想法和意象进行正念反应:南安普敦正念问卷(SMQ)的信度和效度

Responding mindfully to unpleasant thoughts and images: reliability and validity of the Southampton mindfulness questionnaire (SMQ).

作者信息

Chadwick Paul, Hember Martin, Symes Janette, Peters Emmanuelle, Kuipers Elizabeth, Dagnan Dave

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Royal South Hants Hospital, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

Br J Clin Psychol. 2008 Nov;47(Pt 4):451-5. doi: 10.1348/014466508X314891. Epub 2008 Jun 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the reliability and validity of the Southampton mindfulness questionnaire (SMQ), a 16-item measure of mindful awareness of distressing thoughts and images.

METHODS

A total of 256 people participated, comprising a non-clinical community sample of 134 (83 meditators and 51 non-meditators) and a clinical sample of 122 people with a current distressing psychosis. To assess concurrent validity, non-clinical participants and half clinical participants (total 197 participants) completed the mindful attention awareness scale (MAAS). Predicted links were assessed with affect, and 59 patients completed a validated measure to assess link between mindfulness and intensity of 'delusional' experience.

RESULTS

The scale has a single factor structure, was internally reliable, significantly correlated with the MAAS, showed expected associations with affect, and distinguished among meditators, non-meditators and people with psychosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The data support use of the SMQ in clinical practice and research to assess mindful responding to distressing thoughts and images.

摘要

目的

评估南安普敦正念问卷(SMQ)的信效度,这是一项用于测量对痛苦想法和意象的正念觉察的包含16个条目的量表。

方法

共有256人参与,包括134人的非临床社区样本(83名冥想者和51名非冥想者)以及122名患有当前痛苦性精神病的临床样本。为评估同时效度,非临床参与者和一半临床参与者(共197名参与者)完成了正念注意力觉察量表(MAAS)。通过情感评估预测的关联,59名患者完成了一项经过验证的测量,以评估正念与“妄想”体验强度之间的关联。

结果

该量表具有单一因素结构,内部可靠,与MAAS显著相关,显示出与情感的预期关联,并能区分冥想者、非冥想者和精神病患者。

结论

数据支持在临床实践和研究中使用SMQ来评估对痛苦想法和意象的正念反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验