Choi Soo-Young, Lee In-Yong, Sohn Jung-Ho, Lee Yong-Won, Shin Yoo-Seob, Yong Tae-Soon, Hong Chein-Soo, Park Jung-Won
Institute of Allergy and Department of Internal Medicine, Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 Jun;100(6):583-8. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60060-9.
Mechanical laundry is an effective tool for the environmental control of allergens, but the optimal conditions for removing allergens are not yet clear.
To evaluate the optimal conditions of mechanical laundry for the removal of house dust mite (HDM), dog dander, and pollen allergens.
The 4 washing modes of 30 degrees C (86 degrees F), 40 degrees C (104 degrees F), 60 degrees C (140 degrees F), and steam water (SW) with detergent were evaluated. Allergen removal performance was assayed using a 2-site enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or an ELISA inhibition test.
Using the 30 degrees C and 40 degrees C washing modes, only 6.5% and 9.6% of Dermatophagoides farinae, respectively, were killed. However, using the 60 degrees C and SW washing modes, all HDMs were killed. The amounts of Der f 1 remaining after the 30 degrees C, 40 degrees C, 60 degrees C, and SW washing modes were 26.8%, 2.4%, 1.3%, and 0.6%, respectively, with unmanipulated contaminated sheets. The effects of rinse on Der f 1 levels after the 30 degrees C washing were greater compared with those after the 40 degrees C, 60 degrees C, and SW modes. The amounts of Can f 1 in the extractions after washing were 0.3% to 1.3% for all modes, and all extracts, even without a rinse, did not inhibit specific IgE binding to dog allergens according to ELISA. The remaining pollen allergen levels after washing were lower in the 60 degrees C and SW modes than in the lower temperature modes. However, the levels did not differ among the various washing modes after rinsing once.
Water temperature and number of rinses are critical factors for the removal of HDM, dog dander, and pollen allergens.
机械洗涤是控制变应原的一种有效环境控制手段,但去除变应原的最佳条件尚不清楚。
评估机械洗涤去除屋尘螨(HDM)、狗毛屑和花粉变应原的最佳条件。
评估了30摄氏度(86华氏度)、40摄氏度(104华氏度)、60摄氏度(140华氏度)和加洗涤剂的蒸汽水(SW)这4种洗涤模式。使用双位点酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)或ELISA抑制试验检测变应原去除性能。
采用30摄氏度和40摄氏度洗涤模式时,分别仅6.5%和9.6%的粉尘螨被杀死。然而,采用60摄氏度和SW洗涤模式时,所有屋尘螨均被杀死。对于未处理的污染床单,在30摄氏度、40摄氏度、60摄氏度和SW洗涤模式后剩余的Der f 1量分别为26.8%、2.4%、1.3%和0.6%。与40摄氏度、60摄氏度和SW模式相比,30摄氏度洗涤后漂洗对Der f 1水平的影响更大。所有模式下洗涤后提取物中Can f 1的量为0.3%至1.3%,并且根据ELISA,所有提取物(即使未漂洗)均未抑制特异性IgE与狗变应原的结合。60摄氏度和SW模式下洗涤后的剩余花粉变应原水平低于低温模式。然而,漂洗一次后,不同洗涤模式下的水平没有差异。
水温及漂洗次数是去除屋尘螨、狗毛屑和花粉变应原的关键因素。