• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荟萃分析:幽门螺杆菌“检测与治疗”与经验性抑酸治疗消化不良的比较

Meta-analysis: Helicobacter pylori'test and treat' compared with empirical acid suppression for managing dyspepsia.

作者信息

Ford A C, Moayyedi P, Jarbol D E, Logan R F A, Delaney B C

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Sep 1;28(5):534-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03784.x. Epub 2008 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03784.x
PMID:18616641
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Which of Helicobacter pylori'test and treat' or empirical acid suppression should be preferred for the initial management of uncomplicated dyspepsia is controversial. Aim To conduct an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of 'test and treat' vs. empirical acid suppression in adults with uncomplicated dyspepsia in primary care.

METHODS

Investigators provided original data sets for analysis. Effect of management strategy on symptom status and dyspepsia-related resource use at 12-month follow-up was examined by pooling symptom and cost data to obtain relative risk (RR) of remaining symptomatic at 12 months and weighted mean difference (WMD) in costs between the two strategies with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

We identified three eligible RCTs containing 1547 patients, 791 (51%) of whom were assigned to 'test and treat'. There was no difference detected in symptom-cure at 12 months (RR = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.95-1.03). There was a nonsignificant trend towards cost-savings with 'test and treat' (WMD in costs = - 28.91 pound; 95% CI: - 68.48 pound to 10.65 pound).

CONCLUSIONS

There was little difference in symptom-resolution or costs between the two strategies. A combination of patient and physician preference should determine the initial approach to the management of uncomplicated dyspepsia.

摘要

背景

在初级保健中,对于单纯性消化不良的初始管理,幽门螺杆菌“检测和治疗”与经验性抑酸治疗哪种方法更可取存在争议。目的:对初级保健中成人单纯性消化不良的“检测和治疗”与经验性抑酸治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)进行个体患者数据荟萃分析。

方法

研究人员提供原始数据集进行分析。通过汇总症状和成本数据,以获得12个月时仍有症状的相对风险(RR)以及两种策略之间成本的加权平均差(WMD)和95%置信区间(CI),来检验管理策略对12个月随访时症状状态和消化不良相关资源使用的影响。

结果

我们确定了三项符合条件的RCT,共纳入1547例患者,其中791例(51%)被分配至“检测和治疗”组。12个月时症状治愈情况无差异(RR = 0.99;95%CI:0.95 - 1.03)。“检测和治疗”组有节省成本的非显著趋势(成本WMD = - 28.91英镑;95%CI:- 68.48英镑至10.65英镑)。

结论

两种策略在症状缓解或成本方面差异不大。患者和医生的偏好应共同决定单纯性消化不良初始管理的方法。

相似文献

1
Meta-analysis: Helicobacter pylori'test and treat' compared with empirical acid suppression for managing dyspepsia.荟萃分析:幽门螺杆菌“检测与治疗”与经验性抑酸治疗消化不良的比较
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Sep 1;28(5):534-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03784.x. Epub 2008 Jun 27.
2
Economic evaluation of a randomized trial comparing Helicobacter pylori test-and-treat and prompt endoscopy strategies for managing dyspepsia in a primary-care setting.一项随机试验的经济学评估,该试验比较了在基层医疗环境中幽门螺杆菌检测与治疗策略和即时内镜检查策略对消化不良的管理效果。
Clin Ther. 2005 Oct;27(10):1647-57. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.10.011.
3
Cost-effectiveness of and satisfaction with a Helicobacter pylori "test and treat" strategy compared with prompt endoscopy in young Asians with dyspepsia.与及时进行内镜检查相比,幽门螺杆菌“检测与治疗”策略在亚洲年轻消化不良患者中的成本效益及满意度
Gut. 2008 Sep;57(9):1214-20. doi: 10.1136/gut.2007.147728. Epub 2008 Apr 25.
4
The effect of a Helicobacter pylori treatment strategy on health care expenditures in patients with peptic ulcer disease and dyspepsia.幽门螺杆菌治疗策略对消化性溃疡疾病和消化不良患者医疗保健支出的影响。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Sep;98(9):1952-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07584.x.
5
Clinical trial: a randomized trial of early endoscopy, Helicobacter pylori testing and empirical therapy for the management of dyspepsia in primary care.临床研究:在初级保健中,对消化不良的管理进行早期内镜检查、幽门螺杆菌检测和经验性治疗的随机试验。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Jan;29(1):55-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03852.x. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
6
Clinical trial: knowledge of negative Helicobacter pylori status reduces subsequent dyspepsia-related resource use.临床试验:幽门螺杆菌检测结果呈阴性的知晓情况可减少后续与消化不良相关的资源利用。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Nov 1;26(9):1267-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03500.x.
7
A trial of a test-and-treat strategy for Helicobacter pylori positive dyspeptic patients in general practice.一项针对全科医疗中幽门螺杆菌阳性消化不良患者的检测与治疗策略试验。
Int J Clin Pract. 1999 Sep;53(6):413-6.
8
A randomized controlled trial of test-and-treat strategy for Helicobacter pylori: clinical outcomes and health care costs in a managed care population receiving long-term acid suppression therapy for physician-diagnosed peptic ulcer disease.一项关于幽门螺杆菌检测与治疗策略的随机对照试验:在接受长期抑酸治疗的管理式医疗人群中,针对医生诊断的消化性溃疡疾病的临床结局和医疗保健成本。
Arch Intern Med. 2003 May 26;163(10):1165-71. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.10.1165.
9
The health economics of Helicobacter pylori infection.幽门螺杆菌感染的卫生经济学
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;21(2):347-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2006.11.004.
10
A randomised controlled trial of four management strategies for dyspepsia: relationships between symptom subgroups and strategy outcome.消化不良四种管理策略的随机对照试验:症状亚组与策略结果之间的关系
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Aug;51(469):619-24.

引用本文的文献

1
British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the management of functional dyspepsia.英国胃肠病学会功能性消化不良管理指南。
Gut. 2022 Sep;71(9):1697-1723. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327737. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
2
Do Low-Risk Patients With Dyspepsia Need a Gastroscopy? Use of Gastroscopy for Otherwise Healthy Patients With Dyspepsia.消化不良的低风险患者需要做胃镜检查吗?对其他方面健康的消化不良患者进行胃镜检查的情况
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul 5;5(1):32-38. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwab017. eCollection 2022 Feb.
3
Cost-effectiveness modelling of use of urea breath test for the management of -related dyspepsia and peptic ulcer in the UK.
英国尿素呼气试验在相关消化不良和消化性溃疡管理中的成本效益建模。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000685.
4
Treatment Approach of Refractory : A Comprehensive Review.难治性治疗方法:全面综述。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211014087. doi: 10.1177/21501327211014087.
5
The Role of GI Peptides in Functional Dyspepsia and Gastroparesis: A Systematic Review.胃肠肽在功能性消化不良和胃轻瘫中的作用:一项系统评价
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 18;11:172. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00172. eCollection 2020.
6
Effectiveness of management strategies for uninvestigated dyspepsia: systematic review and network meta-analysis.未明确原因的消化不良管理策略的有效性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2019 Dec 11;367:l6483. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6483.
7
Thailand Dyspepsia Guidelines: 2018.《泰国消化不良指南:2018年》
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019 Jan 31;25(1):15-26. doi: 10.5056/jnm18081.
8
Insights into the evaluation and management of dyspepsia: recent developments and new guidelines.消化不良的评估与管理见解:最新进展与新指南
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct 30;11:1756284818805597. doi: 10.1177/1756284818805597. eCollection 2018.
9
ACG and CAG Clinical Guideline: Management of Dyspepsia.ACG 和 CAG 临床指南:消化不良的管理。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul;112(7):988-1013. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.154. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
10
ACG Clinical Guideline: Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection.美国胃肠病学会临床指南:幽门螺杆菌感染的治疗
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Feb;112(2):212-239. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.563. Epub 2017 Jan 10.