Reif John S, Fair Patricia A, Adams Jeffrey, Joseph Brian, Kilpatrick David S, Sanchez Roberto, Goldstein Juli D, Townsend Forrest I, McCulloch Stephen D, Mazzoil Marilyn, Zolman Eric S, Hansen Larry J, Bossart Gregory D
Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2008 Jul 15;233(2):299-307. doi: 10.2460/javma.233.2.299.
To conduct health assessments and compare outcomes in 2 populations of Atlantic bottlenose dolphins. Design-Repeated cross-sectional study.
171 Atlantic bottlenose dolphins.
During June and August of 2003 through 2005, 89 dolphins from the Indian River Lagoon (IRL), Florida, and 82 dolphins from estuarine waters near Charleston, SC, were evaluated. A panel of 5 marine mammal veterinarians classified dolphins as clinically normal, possibly diseased, or definitely diseased on the basis of results of physical and ultrasonographic examinations, hematologic and serum biochemical analyses, and cytologic and microbiologic evaluations of gastric contents and swab specimens.
Prevalence of dolphins classified as definitely diseased did not differ significantly between the IRL (32%) and Charleston (20%) sites. Proportions of dolphins classified as possibly diseased also did not differ. Lobomycosis was diagnosed in 9 dolphins from the IRL but in none of the dolphins from Charleston. Proportions of dolphins with orogenital papillomas did not differ significantly between the IRL (12%) and Charleston (7%) sites. From 2003 through 2005, the proportion classified as definitely diseased tripled among dolphins from the Charleston site but did not increase significantly among dolphins from the IRL. Dolphins from the Charleston site were more likely to have leukocytosis, lymphocytosis, and low serum concentrations of total protein and total J-globulins than were dolphins from the IRL.
High prevalences of diseased dolphins were identified at both sites; however, the host or environmental factors that contributed to the various abnormalities detected are unknown.
对两组大西洋宽吻海豚进行健康评估并比较结果。设计——重复横断面研究。
171头大西洋宽吻海豚。
在2003年至2005年的6月和8月,对来自佛罗里达州印第安河泻湖(IRL)的89头海豚以及来自南卡罗来纳州查尔斯顿附近河口水域的82头海豚进行了评估。由5名海洋哺乳动物兽医组成的小组根据体格检查、超声检查、血液学和血清生化分析结果,以及胃内容物和拭子标本的细胞学和微生物学评估,将海豚分为临床正常、可能患病或确诊患病。
确诊患病的海豚在IRL(32%)和查尔斯顿(20%)两个地点的患病率没有显著差异。被分类为可能患病的海豚比例也没有差异。在IRL的9头海豚中诊断出了芽生菌病,但查尔斯顿的海豚中没有。IRL(12%)和查尔斯顿(7%)两个地点患有口生殖器乳头状瘤的海豚比例没有显著差异。从2003年到2005年,查尔斯顿地点确诊患病的海豚比例增加了两倍,但IRL的海豚中这一比例没有显著增加。与IRL的海豚相比,查尔斯顿地点的海豚更有可能出现白细胞增多、淋巴细胞增多,以及血清总蛋白和总γ球蛋白浓度降低。
在两个地点都发现了高患病率的患病海豚;然而,导致检测到的各种异常情况的宿主或环境因素尚不清楚。