Pedersen W R, Walker M, Olson J D, Gobel F, Lange H W, Daniel J A, Rogers J, Longe T, Kane M, Mooney M R
Abbott-Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis.
Chest. 1991 Aug;100(2):351-6. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.2.351.
To determine if transesophageal echocardiography provides better visualization of valvular vegetations than transthoracic echocardiography, we used both methods to evaluate 24 consecutive patients (mean age, 54 years; 15 female patients and nine male patients) referred for symptoms suggestive of infectious endocarditis. Ten of the 24 patients had one or more valvular prostheses. Echocardiograms were classified as positive or negative based on visualization of valvular vegetations or abscesses. Of ten patients with a final diagnosis of infectious endocarditis on extended follow-up, transthoracic echocardiography was positive in five patients. Transesophageal echocardiography not only yielded abnormal findings in all ten of these patients, but also revealed additional information in four of the five patients with abnormal transthoracic echocardiographic examinations. Among the 14 patients who, on subsequent follow-up, were found not to have infectious endocarditis, transthoracic echocardiography was normal in 13 and falsely abnormal in one. Transesophageal echocardiography revealed no evidence of infectious endocarditis in any of these patients. The ten patients who were determined to have infectious endocarditis all had positive blood cultures and no alternative cause for their clinical presentation; in seven patients in this group who underwent operative or postmortem evaluation, infectious endocarditis was confirmed. All patients without infectious endocarditis were demonstrated to have other causes for their clinical presentation. We conclude that transesophageal echocardiography is a highly valuable test in the work-up of patients with suspected infectious endocarditis, especially those patients with inconclusive or normal transthoracic echocardiograms. In addition, transesophageal echocardiography may be of benefit to patients with previously documented infectious endocarditis and a complicated clinical course in whom additional cardiac lesions are suspected but not demonstrated by transthoracic echocardiography.
为了确定经食管超声心动图是否比经胸超声心动图能更好地显示瓣膜赘生物,我们使用这两种方法对连续24例因提示感染性心内膜炎症状而转诊的患者(平均年龄54岁;15例女性患者和9例男性患者)进行了评估。24例患者中有10例有一个或多个瓣膜假体。根据瓣膜赘生物或脓肿的显示情况,超声心动图被分类为阳性或阴性。在10例经长期随访最终诊断为感染性心内膜炎的患者中,经胸超声心动图有5例呈阳性。经食管超声心动图不仅在所有这10例患者中均发现异常结果,而且在经胸超声心动图检查异常的5例患者中有4例还发现了额外的信息。在随后随访中发现没有感染性心内膜炎的14例患者中,13例经胸超声心动图正常,1例为假阳性。经食管超声心动图在这些患者中均未发现感染性心内膜炎的证据。被确定患有感染性心内膜炎的10例患者血培养均为阳性,且其临床表现无其他原因;该组中7例接受手术或尸检评估的患者,感染性心内膜炎得到证实。所有没有感染性心内膜炎的患者均被证明有其他导致其临床表现的原因。我们得出结论,经食管超声心动图在对疑似感染性心内膜炎患者的检查中是一项非常有价值的检查,尤其是那些经胸超声心动图结果不确定或正常的患者。此外,经食管超声心动图可能对先前有感染性心内膜炎记录且临床病程复杂、怀疑有额外心脏病变但经胸超声心动图未显示的患者有益。