Gupta Navneet, Wolffsohn James S W, Naroo Shehzad A
Ophthalmic Research Group, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Aug;34(8):1329-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.04.031.
To determine whether letter sequences and/or lens-presentation order should be randomized when measuring defocus curves and to assess the most appropriate criterion for calculating the subjective amplitude of accommodation (AoA) from defocus curves.
Eye Clinic, School of Life & Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Defocus curves (from +3.00 diopters [D] to -3.00 D in 0.50 D steps) for 6 possible combinations of randomized or nonrandomized letter sequences and/or lens-presentation order were measured in a random order in 20 presbyopic subjects. Subjective AoA was calculated from the defocus curves by curve fitting using various published criteria, and each was correlated to subjective push-up AoA. Objective AoA was measured for comparison of blur tolerance and pupil size.
Randomization of lens-presentation order and/or letter sequences, or lack of, did not affect the measured defocus curves (P >.05, analysis of variance). The range of defocus that maintains highest achievable visual acuity (allowing for variability of repeated measurement) was better correlated to (r = 0.84) and agreed best with (+/-0.50 D) subjective push-up AoA than any other relative or absolute acuity criterion used in previous studies.
Nonrandomized letters and lens presentation on their own did not affect subjective AoA measured by defocus curves, although their combination should be avoided. Quantification of subjective AoA from defocus curves should be standardized to the range of defocus that maintains the best achievable visual acuity.
确定在测量散焦曲线时字母序列和/或镜片呈现顺序是否应随机化,并评估从散焦曲线计算主观调节幅度(AoA)的最合适标准。
英国伯明翰阿斯顿大学生命与健康科学学院眼科诊所。
对20名老花眼受试者随机测量6种随机或非随机字母序列和/或镜片呈现顺序组合的散焦曲线(从+3.00屈光度[D]到-3.00 D,步长为0.50 D)。使用各种已发表的标准通过曲线拟合从散焦曲线计算主观AoA,并将每个与主观上推AoA相关。测量客观AoA以比较模糊耐受性和瞳孔大小。
镜片呈现顺序和/或字母序列的随机化与否不影响测量的散焦曲线(P>.05,方差分析)。维持最高可达到视力的散焦范围(考虑重复测量的变异性)与主观上推AoA的相关性更好(r = 0.84),并且与之前研究中使用的任何其他相对或绝对视力标准相比,与主观上推AoA的一致性最佳(±0.50 D)。
单独的非随机字母和镜片呈现不影响通过散焦曲线测量的主观AoA,尽管应避免它们的组合。从散焦曲线量化主观AoA应标准化为维持最佳可达到视力的散焦范围。