Voils Corrine I, Sandelowski Margarete, Barroso Julie, Hasselblad Victor
Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Duke University Medical Center.
Field methods. 2008;20(1):3-25. doi: 10.1177/1525822X07307463.
The synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research findings is increasingly promoted, but many of the conceptual and methodological issues it raises have yet to be fully understood and resolved. In this article, we describe how we handled issues encountered in efforts to synthesize the findings in forty-two reports of studies of antiretroviral adherence in HIV-positive women in the course of an ongoing study to develop methods to synthesize qualitative and quantitative research findings in common domains of health-related research. Working with these reports underscored the importance of looking past method claims and ideals and directly at the findings themselves, differentiating between aggregative syntheses in which findings are assimilated and interpretive syntheses in which they are configured, and understanding the judgments involved in designating relationships between findings as confirmatory, divergent, or complementary.
定性和定量研究结果的综合日益受到推崇,但它所引发的许多概念和方法问题尚未得到充分理解和解决。在本文中,我们描述了在一项正在进行的研究过程中,我们如何处理在综合42篇关于HIV阳性女性抗逆转录病毒依从性研究报告的结果时遇到的问题,该研究旨在开发在健康相关研究的共同领域中综合定性和定量研究结果的方法。处理这些报告凸显了超越方法主张和理想,直接关注结果本身的重要性,区分将结果同化的聚合性综合和对结果进行构建的解释性综合,以及理解在将结果之间的关系指定为证实性、分歧性或互补性时所涉及的判断。