Hindié Elif, Champion Christophe, Zanotti-Fregonara Paolo, Rubello Domenico, Colas-Linhart Nicole, Ravasi Laura, Moretti Jean-Luc
Service de Médecine Nucléaire, Hôpital Saint-Louis, 1, avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75475, Paris Cedex 10, France.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009 Jan;36(1):130-6. doi: 10.1007/s00259-008-0893-z. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
We used the Monte Carlo code "CELLDOSE" to assess the dose received by specific target cells from electron emissions in a complex environment. (131)I in a simulated thyroid was used as a model.
Thyroid follicles were represented by 170 microm diameter spherical units made of a lumen of 150 microm diameter containing colloidal matter and a peripheral layer of 10 microm thick thyroid cells. Neighbouring follicles are 4 microm apart. (131)I was assumed to be homogeneously distributed in the lumen and absent in cells. We firstly assessed electron dose distribution in a single follicle. Then, we expanded the simulation by progressively adding neighbouring layers of follicles, so to reassess the electron dose to this single follicle implemented with the contribution of the added layers.
Electron dose gradient around a point source showed that the (131)I electron dose is close to zero after 2,100 microm. Therefore, we studied all contributions to the central follicle deriving from follicles within 12 orders of neighbourhood (15,624 follicles surrounding the central follicle). The dose to colloid of the single follicle was twice as high as the dose to thyroid cells. Even when all neighbours were taken into account, the dose in the central follicle remained heterogeneous. For a 1-Gy average dose to tissue, the dose to colloidal matter was 1.168 Gy, the dose to thyroid cells was 0.982 Gy, and the dose to the inter-follicular tissue was 0.895 Gy. Analysis of the different contributions to thyroid cell dose showed that 17.3% of the dose derived from the colloidal matter of their own follicle, while the remaining 82.7% was delivered by the surrounding follicles. On the basis of these data, it is shown that when different follicles contain different concentrations of (131)I, the impact in terms of cell dose heterogeneity can be important.
By means of (131)I in the thyroid as a theoretical model, we showed how a Monte Carlo code can be used to map electron dose deposit and build up the dose to target cells in a complex multi-source environment. This approach can be of considerable interest for comparing different radiopharmaceuticals as therapy agents in oncology.
我们使用蒙特卡罗代码“CELLDOSE”来评估在复杂环境中特定靶细胞从电子发射中所接受的剂量。以模拟甲状腺中的(131)I作为模型。
甲状腺滤泡由直径170微米的球形单元表示,其由直径150微米的含有胶体物质的管腔和10微米厚的甲状腺细胞外周层组成。相邻滤泡间距为4微米。假设(131)I在管腔中均匀分布且不存在于细胞中。我们首先评估单个滤泡中的电子剂量分布。然后,通过逐步添加相邻的滤泡层来扩展模拟,以便重新评估这个单个滤泡在添加层的贡献下所接受的电子剂量。
点源周围的电子剂量梯度表明,在2100微米后(131)I电子剂量接近零。因此,我们研究了来自12个邻域内滤泡(围绕中央滤泡的15624个滤泡)对中央滤泡的所有贡献。单个滤泡中胶体的剂量是甲状腺细胞剂量的两倍。即使考虑了所有相邻滤泡,中央滤泡中的剂量仍然不均匀。对于组织平均剂量为1 Gy,胶体物质的剂量为1.168 Gy,甲状腺细胞的剂量为0.982 Gy,滤泡间组织的剂量为0.895 Gy。对甲状腺细胞剂量不同贡献的分析表明,17.3%的剂量来自其自身滤泡的胶体物质,而其余82.7%由周围滤泡提供。基于这些数据表明,当不同滤泡含有不同浓度的(131)I时,细胞剂量异质性方面的影响可能很大。
通过以甲状腺中的(131)I作为理论模型,我们展示了如何使用蒙特卡罗代码来绘制电子剂量沉积图,并在复杂的多源环境中建立靶细胞的剂量。这种方法对于比较不同放射性药物作为肿瘤治疗剂可能具有相当大的意义。