• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

攻击性驾驶中的宽恕与对未来后果的考虑。

Forgiveness and consideration of future consequences in aggressive driving.

作者信息

Moore Michael, Dahlen Eric R

机构信息

The University of Southern Mississippi, Department of Psychology, 118 College Drive #5025, Hattiesburg, MS 39406-0001, USA.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Sep;40(5):1661-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.05.007. Epub 2008 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2008.05.007
PMID:18760093
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2574511/
Abstract

Most research on aggressive driving has focused on identifying aspects of driver personality which will exacerbate it (e.g., sensation seeking, impulsiveness, driving anger, etc.). The present study was designed to examine two theoretically relevant but previously unexplored personality factors predicted to reduce the risk of aggressive driving: trait forgiveness and consideration of future consequences. The utility of these variables in predicting aggressive driving and driving anger expression was evaluated among 316 college student volunteers. Hierarchical multiple regressions permitted an analysis of the incremental validity of these constructs beyond respondent gender, age, miles driven per week, and driving anger. Both forgiveness and consideration of future consequences contributed to the prediction of aggressive driving and driving anger expression, independent of driving anger. Research on aggressive driving may be enhanced by greater attention to adaptive, potentially risk-reducing traits. Moreover, forgiveness and consideration of future consequences may have implications for accident prevention.

摘要

大多数关于攻击性驾驶的研究都集中在确定会加剧攻击性驾驶的驾驶员个性方面(例如,寻求刺激、冲动、驾驶愤怒等)。本研究旨在检验两个理论上相关但此前未被探索过的个性因素,预计这两个因素会降低攻击性驾驶的风险:特质宽恕和对未来后果的考虑。在316名大学生志愿者中评估了这些变量在预测攻击性驾驶和驾驶愤怒表达方面的效用。分层多元回归允许分析这些构念在受访者性别、年龄、每周行驶里程和驾驶愤怒之外的增量效度。宽恕和对未来后果的考虑都有助于预测攻击性驾驶和驾驶愤怒表达,且与驾驶愤怒无关。对攻击性驾驶的研究可能会因更多关注适应性的、潜在降低风险的特质而得到加强。此外,宽恕和对未来后果的考虑可能对事故预防有启示意义。

相似文献

1
Forgiveness and consideration of future consequences in aggressive driving.攻击性驾驶中的宽恕与对未来后果的考虑。
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Sep;40(5):1661-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.05.007. Epub 2008 Jun 20.
2
Driving anger, sensation seeking, impulsiveness, and boredom proneness in the prediction of unsafe driving.在预测不安全驾驶行为方面的驾驶愤怒、寻求刺激、冲动性和易无聊倾向。
Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Mar;37(2):341-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2004.10.006.
3
Forgivingness, anger, and hostility in aggressive driving.攻击性驾驶中的宽容、愤怒和敌意。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Jan;62:303-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.017. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
4
The effect of stress and personality on dangerous driving behavior among Chinese drivers.压力和性格对中国驾驶员危险驾驶行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Dec;73:34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.024. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
5
Individual difference factors in risky driving: the roles of anger/hostility, conscientiousness, and sensation-seeking.危险驾驶中的个体差异因素:愤怒/敌意、尽责性和寻求刺激的作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2006 Jul;38(4):801-10. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.02.004. Epub 2006 Mar 9.
6
Driving anger, emotional and instrumental aggressiveness, and impulsiveness in the prediction of aggressive and transgressive driving.驾驶愤怒、情绪和工具性攻击性以及冲动性对攻击性和越轨驾驶的预测。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Jan;50:758-67. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.06.029. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
7
Taking a look behind the wheel: an investigation into the personality predictors of aggressive driving.看看方向盘后面:攻击性驾驶的人格预测因素研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Mar;45:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.11.012. Epub 2011 Dec 26.
8
Validation of the propensity for angry driving scale.愤怒驾驶量表倾向的验证。
J Safety Res. 2004;35(5):557-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2004.09.002.
9
Effects of personality on risky driving behavior and accident involvement for Chinese drivers.个性对中国驾驶员冒险驾驶行为和事故参与的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(6):565-71. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.748903.
10
Trait Predictors of Aggression and Crash-Related Behaviors Across Drivers from the United Kingdom and the Irish Republic.英国和爱尔兰共和国驾驶员攻击性行为及与撞车相关行为的特质预测因素
Risk Anal. 2015 Sep;35(9):1730-45. doi: 10.1111/risa.12379. Epub 2015 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of core self-evaluation, mindful awareness, & anger rumination on forgiveness.核心自我评价、正念觉察与愤怒沉思对宽恕的影响。
Cogn Process. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.1007/s10339-025-01274-9.
2
Self-reported changes in aggressive driving within the past five years, and during COVID-19.过去五年内以及 COVID-19 期间,自我报告的攻击性驾驶行为变化。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 1;17(8):e0272422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272422. eCollection 2022.
3
The Effects of Forgiveness, Gratitude, and Self-Control on Reactive and Proactive Aggression in Bullying.宽恕、感激和自我控制对欺凌中反应性和主动性攻击的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 10;17(16):5760. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165760.
4
Trait driving anger and driving styles among Colombian professional drivers.哥伦比亚职业司机中引发愤怒情绪的特质与驾驶风格
Heliyon. 2019 Aug 8;5(8):e02259. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02259. eCollection 2019 Aug.
5
CLASH: Climate (change) and cultural evolution of intergroup conflict.冲突:气候变化与群体间冲突的文化演变
Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2018 Apr;21(3):457-471. doi: 10.1177/1368430217735579. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
6
Consideration of future consequences (CFC) serves as a buffer against aggression related to psychopathy.考虑未来的后果(CFC)可以作为对抗与精神病态相关的攻击性的缓冲。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 12;13(9):e0203663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203663. eCollection 2018.
7
Does Promotion Orientation Help Explain Why Future-Orientated People Exercise and Eat Healthy?促进导向有助于解释为什么注重未来的人会锻炼和保持健康饮食吗?
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 25;8:1202. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01202. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Deaths: final data for 2005.死亡情况:2005年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2008 Apr 24;56(10):1-120.
2
Individual difference factors in risky driving: the roles of anger/hostility, conscientiousness, and sensation-seeking.危险驾驶中的个体差异因素:愤怒/敌意、尽责性和寻求刺激的作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2006 Jul;38(4):801-10. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.02.004. Epub 2006 Mar 9.
3
Consideration of future consequences and unprotected anal intercourse among men who have sex with men.男男性行为者对未来后果的考量及无保护肛交行为
J Homosex. 2005;50(1):119-33. doi: 10.1300/J082v50n01_06.
4
Driving anger, sensation seeking, impulsiveness, and boredom proneness in the prediction of unsafe driving.在预测不安全驾驶行为方面的驾驶愤怒、寻求刺激、冲动性和易无聊倾向。
Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Mar;37(2):341-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2004.10.006.
5
Forgivingness, vengeful rumination, and affective traits.宽容、报复性沉思与情感特质。
J Pers. 2005 Feb;73(1):183-225. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00308.x.
6
Effects of forgiveness therapy on anger, mood, and vulnerability to substance use among inpatient substance-dependent clients.宽恕疗法对住院物质依赖患者的愤怒、情绪及物质使用易感性的影响。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Dec;72(6):1114-21. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.6.1114.
7
Validation of the propensity for angry driving scale.愤怒驾驶量表倾向的验证。
J Safety Res. 2004;35(5):557-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2004.09.002.
8
Individual differences in sensitivity to health communications: consideration of future consequences.健康信息传播敏感度的个体差异:对未来后果的考量
Health Psychol. 2004 Jul;23(4):388-96. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.4.388.
9
The aggression paradox: understanding links among aggression, sensation seeking, and the consideration of future consequences.攻击悖论:理解攻击、寻求刺激与对未来后果的考虑之间的联系。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Jun;84(6):1287-302. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1287.
10
Anger, aggression, and risky behavior: a comparison of high and low anger drivers.愤怒、攻击性与危险行为:高愤怒水平与低愤怒水平驾驶者的比较
Behav Res Ther. 2003 Jun;41(6):701-18. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(02)00046-3.