Percy D H, Williams K L, Paturzo F X
Department of Pathology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Canada.
Arch Virol. 1991;119(3-4):175-80. doi: 10.1007/BF01310668.
Sialodacryoadenitis virus (SDAV) and Parker's rat coronavirus (PRC) are two recognized viral strains which cause spontaneous disease in the laboratory rat. Currently there is no recognized practical procedure which will accurately differentiate infections with these strains. Using SDAV- and PRC-infected L-2 cells as the source of antigen, and sera from rats collected post inoculation with either of these viral strains, the indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) procedure was used to determine whether antibody titers could be used to differentiate infections from the homologous and heterologous virus. There was no detectable difference in the sensitivity or specificity of these systems in detecting antibody to the homologous or heterologous virus. Thus there was no evidence that SDAV- and PRC-infected cells would serve to differentiate antibody to the homologous virus using the IFA technique. In addition, antibody titers were similar when mouse hepatitis virus (MHV)-infected cells were used as the source of antigen for the IFA technique. However, using MHV or SDAV-infected cells as the source of antigen, there was a significant difference in antibody titers to the homologous virus detected using the immunoenzyme technique.
涎泪腺炎病毒(SDAV)和帕克大鼠冠状病毒(PRC)是两种已被确认的能在实验大鼠中引发自发性疾病的病毒株。目前尚无公认的实用方法能够准确区分这两种病毒株的感染情况。以感染SDAV和PRC的L - 2细胞作为抗原来源,并使用接种这两种病毒株之一后采集的大鼠血清,采用间接荧光抗体(IFA)法来确定抗体滴度是否可用于区分同源病毒和异源病毒的感染。在检测针对同源或异源病毒的抗体时,这些系统在敏感性或特异性方面没有可检测到的差异。因此,没有证据表明使用IFA技术时,感染SDAV和PRC的细胞可用于区分针对同源病毒的抗体。此外,当使用感染小鼠肝炎病毒(MHV)的细胞作为IFA技术的抗原来源时,抗体滴度相似。然而,使用感染MHV或SDAV的细胞作为抗原来源时,采用免疫酶技术检测到的针对同源病毒的抗体滴度存在显著差异。