Ball Frank G, Knock Edward S, O'Neill Philip D
School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.
Math Biosci. 2008 Nov;216(1):100-13. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2008.08.008.
This paper is concerned with a stochastic model for the spread of an SEIR (susceptible --> exposed (= latent) --> infective --> removed) epidemic among a population partitioned into households, featuring different rates of infection for within and between households. The model incorporates responsive vaccination and isolation policies, based upon the appearance of diagnosed cases in households. Different models for imperfect vaccine response are considered. A threshold parameter R*, which determines whether or not a major epidemic can occur, and the probability of a major epidemic are obtained for different infectious and latent period distributions. Simpler expressions for these quantities are obtained in the limiting case of infinite within-household infection rate. Numerical studies suggest that the choice of infectious period distribution and whether or not latent individuals are vaccine-sensitive have a material influence on the spread of the epidemic, while, for given vaccine efficacy, the choice of vaccine action model is less influential. They also suggest that an effective isolation policy has a more significant impact than vaccination. The results show that R* alone is not sufficient to summarise the potential for an epidemic.
本文关注的是一个关于SEIR(易感者→潜伏者(=暴露者)→感染者→康复者)传染病在一个分为家庭的人群中传播的随机模型,该模型的特点是家庭内部和家庭之间具有不同的感染率。该模型纳入了基于家庭中确诊病例出现情况的响应式疫苗接种和隔离政策。考虑了不同的不完全疫苗反应模型。对于不同的感染期和潜伏期分布,得到了一个决定是否会发生大流行的阈值参数R以及大流行的概率。在家庭内部感染率无穷大的极限情况下,得到了这些量的更简单表达式。数值研究表明,感染期分布的选择以及潜伏个体是否对疫苗敏感对疫情传播有重大影响,而在给定疫苗效力的情况下,疫苗作用模型的选择影响较小。研究还表明,有效的隔离政策比疫苗接种有更显著的影响。结果表明,仅R不足以概括疫情的潜在可能性。