Vollmer T R, Iwata B A
Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1991 Summer;24(2):279-91. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-279.
Positive reinforcement procedures have had a major impact on educational programs for the developmentally disabled; nevertheless, variation in reinforcer effectiveness both within and across individuals is a common phenomenon. This study examined one class of variables--establishing operations--that might influence the effectiveness of reinforcers. Five developmentally disabled adult males participated. Responding on one of two motor tasks--switch closure or block placement--was assessed during baseline, satiation, and deprivation conditions with respect to three classes of consequences: small food items, music, and social praise. Deprivation and satiation conditions were constructed so as not to alter significantly the normal course of events in a subject's day. For example, food deprivation entailed scheduling sessions just prior to a subject's regular lunch, and social deprivation involved limiting a subject's access to social interaction for 15 minutes, during which time the subject had access to an assortment of other activities. Results showed that each stimulus class functioned as reinforcement with different degrees of effectiveness during satiation versus deprivation conditions. These results are discussed in light of previous research on enhancement of reinforcer efficacy as well as the assessment and identification of functional reinforcers, and implications are presented for future research and client habilitation.
正强化程序对发育障碍者的教育项目产生了重大影响;然而,强化物有效性在个体内部和个体之间存在差异是一种常见现象。本研究考察了一类可能影响强化物有效性的变量——建立操作。五名成年男性发育障碍者参与了研究。在基线、饱足和剥夺条件下,针对三类后果(小食物、音乐和社会赞扬)评估了两项运动任务(开关闭合或积木放置)中的一项的反应。构建饱足和剥夺条件时,尽量不显著改变受试者日常活动的正常进程。例如,食物剥夺是指在受试者正常午餐前安排实验时段,社会剥夺则是指限制受试者进行15分钟的社交互动,在此期间受试者可以进行各种其他活动。结果表明,在饱足与剥夺条件下,每类刺激作为强化物的作用效果不同。根据先前关于提高强化物效能以及功能性强化物评估与识别的研究对这些结果进行了讨论,并提出了对未来研究和客户 habilitation的启示。