Plymouth State Home.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1971 Fall;4(3):201-13. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1971.4-201.
An attempt was made to eliminate the self-injurious behaviors of four institutionalized, profoundly retarded adolescents. Some of the behaviors studied were: face-slapping, face-banging, hair-pulling, face-scratching, and finger-biting. Three remediative approaches to self-injurious behavior were compared. Elimination of all social consequences of the self-injurious behavior was not effective with the two subjects with whom it was attempted. The same two subjects were exposed to a procedure involving reinforcement of non-self-injurious behavior which was ineffective under no food deprivation and was effective with one of the two subjects under mild food deprivation. Electric-shock punishment eliminated the self-injurious behaviors of all four subjects with whom it was attempted. The results suggested that punishment was more effective than differential reinforcement of non-self-injurious behavior which, in turn, was more effective than extinction through elimination of social consequences. However, the effects of the punishment were usually specific to the setting in which it was administered. In order to eliminate the self-injurious behaviors of severely retarded children, it is apparently necessary to carry out the treatment in many of the settings in which it occurs.
尝试消除了四名机构性、严重智障青少年的自伤行为。研究中的一些行为包括:打脸、打脸、拔头发、抓脸和咬手指。三种矫正自伤行为的方法进行了比较。消除自伤行为的所有社会后果对尝试的两名受试者均无效。对同样的两名受试者进行了涉及强化非自伤行为的程序,在没有食物剥夺的情况下无效,在两名受试者中的一名轻度食物剥夺的情况下有效。电击惩罚消除了所有四名受试者的自伤行为。结果表明,惩罚比非自伤行为的差异强化更有效,而差异强化又比通过消除社会后果的消除更有效。然而,惩罚的效果通常是特定于实施它的环境。为了消除严重智障儿童的自伤行为,显然需要在发生自伤行为的许多环境中进行治疗。