Suppr超能文献

经皮电神经刺激与治疗性运动对慢性下腰痛老年人的疗效:一项随机对照试验。

Efficacy of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and therapeutic exercise for older adults with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Weiner Debra K, Perera Subashan, Rudy Thomas E, Glick Ronald M, Shenoy Sonali, Delitto Anthony

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA Center for Integrative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Pain. 2008 Nov 30;140(2):344-357. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.09.005. Epub 2008 Oct 17.

Abstract

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) in older adults may be disabling and therapeutically challenging, largely because of the inefficacy and/or morbidity associated with traditional pain treatment. We conducted a randomized controlled trial in 200 men and women > or = age 65 with CLBP to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS) with and without general conditioning and aerobic exercise (GCAE), for reducing pain and improving physical function. Participants were randomized to receive (1) PENS, (2) control-PENS (brief electrical stimulation to control for treatment expectancy), (3) PENS+GCAE, or (4) control-PENS+GCAE, twice a week for 6 weeks. All four groups experienced significantly reduced pain (range -2.3 to -4.1 on the McGill Pain Questionnaire short form), improved self-reported disability (range -2.1 to -3.0 on Roland scale) and improved gait velocity (0.04-0.07 m/s), sustained at 6 months. The GCAE groups experienced significantly fewer fear avoidance beliefs immediately post-intervention and at 6 months than non-GCAE groups. There were no significant side effects. Since brief electrical stimulation (i.e., control-PENS) facilitated comparably reduced pain and improved function at 6 months as compared with PENS, the exact dose of electrical stimulation required for analgesia cannot be determined. GCAE was more effective than PENS alone in reducing fear avoidance beliefs, but not in reducing pain or in improving physical function.

摘要

老年人的慢性腰痛(CLBP)可能会导致残疾,且在治疗上具有挑战性,这主要是因为传统疼痛治疗存在无效性和/或引发疾病。我们对200名年龄≥65岁的患有CLBP的男性和女性进行了一项随机对照试验,以评估经皮电神经刺激(PENS)联合或不联合一般调理及有氧运动(GCAE)在减轻疼痛和改善身体功能方面的疗效。参与者被随机分为四组,分别接受:(1)PENS;(2)对照-PENS(短暂电刺激以控制治疗期望);(3)PENS+GCAE;或(4)对照-PENS+GCAE,每周两次,共6周。所有四组在6个月时疼痛均显著减轻(麦吉尔疼痛问卷简表评分降低范围为-2.3至-4.1),自我报告的残疾情况得到改善(罗兰量表评分降低范围为-2.1至-3.0),步态速度提高(0.04 - 0.07米/秒)。与非GCAE组相比,GCAE组在干预后即刻及6个月时恐惧回避信念显著减少。未出现明显副作用。由于与PENS相比,短暂电刺激(即对照-PENS)在6个月时能同等程度地减轻疼痛并改善功能,因此无法确定镇痛所需的精确电刺激剂量。GCAE在减少恐惧回避信念方面比单独使用PENS更有效,但在减轻疼痛或改善身体功能方面并非如此。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
An Updated Overview of Low Back Pain Management.腰痛管理的最新概述。
Asian Spine J. 2022 Dec;16(6):968-982. doi: 10.31616/asj.2021.0371. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
6
Exercise therapy for chronic low back pain.慢性下背痛的运动疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 28;9(9):CD009790. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009790.pub2.

本文引用的文献

3
10
The cognitive effects of opioids.阿片类药物的认知效应。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2004 Jun;5(2):75-93. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2003.11.002.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验