Suppr超能文献

比较单克隆抗体和聚合酶链反应检测鉴定李痘病毒 D 血清型和 M 血清型分离物的方法。

Comparison of monoclonal antibodies and polymerase chain reaction assays for the typing of isolates belonging to the d and m serotypes of plum pox potyvirus.

出版信息

Phytopathology. 1998 Mar;88(3):198-204. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.1998.88.3.198.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Plum pox potyvirus (PPV) isolates may be divided into four groups separated by serological, molecular, and epidemiological differences. Monoclonal antibodies specific for the two major groups of isolates, represented by the D and M serotypes of the virus, have been obtained. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays allowing the direct detection and differentiation of PPV isolates have also been developed. We now report on a large-scale comparison of these two typing approaches. The results obtained show an overall excellent correlation between the results obtained in indirect double-antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using PPV-D- and PPV-M-specific monoclonal antibodies and those derived from either specific PCR assays or restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of PCR fragments. Without exception, all isolates reacting positively with the PPV-M-specific monoclonal antibody were found to belong to the M serotype using the PCR-based assays, while 51 out of 53 isolates recognized by the D-specific monoclonal antibodies belonged to the D serotype according to the PCR typing results. However, failure to react with a specific monoclonal antibody did not prove as effective a predictor of the serotype of the isolate analyzed. In a few cases, the results obtained with the various techniques diverged, indicating low level variability of the epitopes recognized by the serotype-specific monoclonal antibodies. Isolates belonging to the two minor groups of PPV (El Amar and Cherry) also gave divergent results, indicating that the current typing assays are not suited for the analysis of such isolates.

摘要

摘要李痘病毒(PPV)分离株可根据血清学、分子和流行病学差异分为四个组。已获得针对病毒 D 和 M 血清型这两个主要分离株组的特异性单克隆抗体。还开发了基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的检测方法,可直接检测和区分 PPV 分离株。我们现在报告了这两种分型方法的大规模比较。结果表明,间接双抗体夹心酶联免疫吸附试验中使用的 PPV-D 和 PPV-M 特异性单克隆抗体与特定 PCR 检测或 PCR 片段限制性片段长度多态性分析获得的结果之间存在总体良好的相关性。无一例外,使用基于 PCR 的检测方法,与 PPV-M 特异性单克隆抗体反应阳性的所有分离株均被鉴定为 M 血清型,而根据 PCR 分型结果,53 个被 D 特异性单克隆抗体识别的分离株中有 51 个属于 D 血清型。然而,与特定单克隆抗体不反应并不能有效地预测所分析分离株的血清型。在某些情况下,各种技术的结果存在差异,表明血清型特异性单克隆抗体识别的表位存在低水平的变异。属于 PPV 的两个较小组(El Amar 和樱桃)的分离株也给出了不同的结果,表明当前的分型检测不适合此类分离株的分析。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验