Kai Masanori, Nguyen Phuc Nhu Ha, Hoang Thi Thuy Huong, Nguyen An Hoang, Fukutomi Yasuo, Maeda Yumi, Miyamoto Yuji, Mukai Tetsu, Fujiwara Tsuyoshi, Nguyen Tan Thanh, Makino Masahiko
Department of Microbiology, Leprosy Research Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, 4-2-1 Aoba-cho, Higashimurayama, Tokyo 189-0002, Japan.
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2008 Dec;15(12):1755-9. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00148-08. Epub 2008 Oct 22.
A serological diagnostic test using phenolic glycolipid-I (PGL-I) developed in the 1980s is commercially available, but the method is still inefficient in detecting all forms of leprosy. Therefore, more-specific and -reliable serological methods have been sought. We have characterized major membrane protein II (MMP-II) as a candidate protein for a new serological antigen. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using the MMP-II antigen (MMP-II ELISA) for detecting antibodies in leprosy patients and patients' contacts in the mid-region of Vietnam and compared to the results to those for the PGL-I method (PGL-I ELISA). The results showed that 85% of multibacillary patients and 48% of paucibacillary patients were positive by MMP-II ELISA. Comparison between the serological tests showed that positivity rates for leprosy patients were higher with MMP-II ELISA than with PGL-I ELISA. Household contacts (HHCs) showed low positivity rates, but medical staff members showed comparatively high positivity rates, with MMP-II ELISA. Furthermore, monitoring of results for leprosy patients and HHCs showed that MMP-II is a better index marker than PGL-I. Overall, the epidemiological study conducted in Vietnam suggests that serological testing with MMP-II would be beneficial in detecting leprosy.
20世纪80年代开发的一种使用酚糖脂-I(PGL-I)的血清学诊断测试已商业化,但该方法在检测所有形式的麻风病方面仍然效率低下。因此,人们一直在寻找更特异、更可靠的血清学方法。我们已将主要膜蛋白II(MMP-II)鉴定为一种新的血清学抗原的候选蛋白。在本研究中,我们评估了使用MMP-II抗原的酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)(MMP-II ELISA)在越南中部地区检测麻风病患者及其接触者抗体的有效性,并将结果与PGL-I方法(PGL-I ELISA)的结果进行比较。结果显示,85%的多菌型患者和48%的少菌型患者通过MMP-II ELISA检测呈阳性。血清学检测之间的比较表明,麻风病患者使用MMP-II ELISA的阳性率高于使用PGL-I ELISA。家庭接触者(HHC)的阳性率较低,但医护人员使用MMP-II ELISA的阳性率相对较高。此外,对麻风病患者和HHC的结果监测表明,MMP-II是比PGL-I更好的指标标志物。总体而言,在越南进行的流行病学研究表明,使用MMP-II进行血清学检测有助于检测麻风病。