Were Martin C, Abernathy Greg, Hui Siu L, Kempf Carol, Weiner Michael
Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202-3012, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Mar-Apr;16(2):196-202. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2932. Epub 2008 Oct 24.
Only half of consultants' medical recommendations are implemented. We created a tool that lets referring providers review and implement electronic recommendations made by consultants, with the hypothesis that facilitation with our tool could improve implementation.
The tool was piloted among geriatrics consultants and hospitalists. Pre-post evaluation was done with control (before pilot; N=20) and intervention (after pilot; N=20) patients. Consultants wrote notes containing recommendations for all study patients, and entered electronic recommendations only for intervention patients. We analyzed all recommendations and surveyed hospitalists.
A total of 249 recommendations were made for intervention patients versus 192 for controls (p<0.05). Of all recommendations about intervention patients, 78% were implemented, compared to 59% for controls (p=0.01). Of the intervention recommendations, 77% were entered electronically using our tool; of these, 86% were implemented. All 24 survey respondents indicated that the system improved quality, saved time, and should be expanded.
Consultant recommendations were implemented 30% more often when there was electronic facilitation of recommendations.
会诊医生提出的医疗建议仅有一半得到执行。我们开发了一种工具,可让转诊医生查看并执行会诊医生给出的电子建议,我们的假设是借助该工具可提高建议的执行率。
该工具在老年病会诊医生和住院医生中进行了试点。对对照组(试点前;N = 20)和干预组(试点后;N = 20)患者进行了前后评估。会诊医生为所有研究患者撰写包含建议的记录,仅为干预组患者录入电子建议。我们分析了所有建议并对住院医生进行了调查。
干预组患者共收到249条建议,对照组为192条(p<0.05)。在所有针对干预组患者的建议中,78%得到执行,而对照组为59%(p = 0.01)。在干预建议中,77%通过我们的工具以电子方式录入;其中,86%得到执行。所有24位接受调查的住院医生均表示该系统提高了质量、节省了时间,应予以推广。
当建议通过电子方式提供便利时,会诊医生的建议执行率提高了30%。