Farré Marinella, Martínez Elena, Hernando M-D, Fernández-Alba Amadeo, Fritz Johann, Unruh Eckehardt, Mihail Otilia, Sakkas Vasilis, Morbey Ana, Albanis Triantafyllos, Brito Fatima, Hansen Peter D, Barceló Damià
IIQAB-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, C/Jordi Girona 18-26, Barcelona, Spain.
Talanta. 2006 Apr 15;69(2):323-33. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2005.09.047. Epub 2005 Nov 14.
An inter-laboratory comparison exercise was conducted under the European Union funded project entitled: Screening Methods for Water Data Information in Support of the Implementation of the Water Framework Directive (SWIFT-WFD) and coordinated by the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), in order to evaluate the reproducibility of different toxicity tests based on the bioluminescence inhibition of Vibrio fischeri, for the rapid water toxicity assessment. For the first time, this type of exercise has been organized in Europe, and using different tests based on the same principle. In this exercise, 10 laboratories from 8 countries (Austria, Cyprus, Germany, Greece, Italy, Portugal, Romania, and Spain) took place, and a total number of 360 samples were distributed. During the exercise, six series of six samples were analyzed along 5 months. Every batch of samples was composed by three real samples and three standard solutions. The real samples were: a raw influent and the effluent of a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), and a sample from a first settlement of the WWTP spiked with a mixture of toxicant standards. A final number of 330 (91.7%) samples was analyzed, 3300 values in duplicate were collected, and the results for each sample were expressed as the 50% effective concentration (EC(50)) values calculated through five points of dilution inhibition curves, after 5 and 15min of incubation times. A statistical study was initiated using 660 results. The mean values, standard deviations (sigma), variances (sigma(2)), and upper and lower warning limits (UWL and LWL) were obtained, using the EC(50) values calculated with the result from the participating laboratories. The main objectives of this toxicity ring study were to evaluate the repeatability (r) and reproducibility (R) when different laboratories conduct the test, the influence of complex matrix samples, the variability between different tests based on the same principle, and to determine the rate at which participating laboratories successfully completed tests initiated. In this exercise, the 3.93% toxicity values were outliers according with the Z-score values and the Dixon test. The samples with the greater number of outliers were those with the smallest variability coefficient, corresponding to the greater and the smaller toxicity level. No relation was found through the cluster analysis, between the final results and the different commercial devices involved. Testing by multiple commercial devices did not appear to reduce the precision of the results, and the variability coefficient for the exercise was nearby to the average value for past editions carried out at national level, where the different participants used the same commercial device. Stability of samples was also followed during the exercise. While statistical significance differences were not found for the greater part of samples, for the sample from the WWTP influent, a significant decrease of the toxicity value was found along this study. Nevertheless, this was a type of sample with a high toxicity level during all the exercise. On the other hand, in order to obtain the chemical characterization of real samples, those were analyzed by chromatographic techniques, using different sequential solid phase extraction (SSPE) procedures, followed by liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC-MS), and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Good agreement was found between the chemical analysis results and the toxicity level of the samples.
在欧盟资助的名为“支持水框架指令实施的水数据信息筛选方法(SWIFT-WFD)”的项目下,开展了一项实验室间比对活动,该活动由西班牙科学研究高级理事会(CSIC)协调,旨在评估基于费氏弧菌生物发光抑制的不同毒性测试在快速水毒性评估中的重现性。此类活动在欧洲尚属首次,且使用基于相同原理的不同测试方法。在此次活动中,来自8个国家(奥地利、塞浦路斯、德国、希腊、意大利、葡萄牙、罗马尼亚和西班牙)的10个实验室参与其中,共分发了360个样品。在活动期间,沿着5个月的时间分析了6组,每组6个样品。每批样品由3个实际样品和3个标准溶液组成。实际样品包括:一个污水处理厂(WWTP)的原进水、该厂的出水,以及一个用有毒标准混合物加标的WWTP初次沉淀池样品。最终共分析了330个(91.7%)样品,收集了一式两份的3300个值,每个样品的结果表示为通过5个稀释抑制曲线点计算得出的50%有效浓度(EC(50))值,孵育时间分别为5分钟和15分钟。利用660个结果开展了一项统计研究。使用参与实验室的结果计算出的EC(50)值,得出了平均值、标准差(σ)、方差(σ²)以及上下警告限(UWL和LWL)。此次毒性循环研究的主要目的是评估不同实验室进行测试时的重复性(r)和重现性(R)、复杂基质样品的影响、基于相同原理的不同测试之间的变异性,以及确定参与实验室成功完成起始测试的速率。在此次活动中,根据Z分数值和狄克逊检验,3.93%的毒性值为异常值。异常值数量较多的样品是变异系数最小的样品,分别对应毒性水平较高和较低的情况。通过聚类分析未发现最终结果与所涉及的不同商业设备之间存在关联。使用多种商业设备进行测试似乎并未降低结果的精度,此次活动的变异系数接近过去在国家层面开展的版本的平均值,当时不同参与者使用相同的商业设备。活动期间还跟踪了样品的稳定性。虽然大部分样品未发现统计学显著差异,但对于WWTP进水样品,在整个研究过程中发现毒性值有显著下降。然而,在整个活动期间,这是一种毒性水平较高的样品类型。另一方面,为了获得实际样品的化学特征,使用不同的连续固相萃取(SSPE)程序,随后进行液相色谱-质谱联用(LC-MS)和气相色谱-质谱联用(GC-MS),通过色谱技术对这些样品进行了分析。化学分析结果与样品的毒性水平之间发现了良好的一致性。