Hollis Bruce W
Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425, USA.
Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2008 Dec;15(6):489-94. doi: 10.1097/MED.0b013e328317ca6c.
The assessment of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] for clinical diagnosis has increased in an exponential fashion during the past 5 years. It is thus timely to review the reasons for this increase as well as the diverse analytical methods used to meet this need.
Nutritional vitamin D status, as defined by circulating levels of 25(OH)D, has long been implicated in skeletal health. However, in the past decade circulating 25(OH)D has been strongly linked in humans to cancer rates, autoimmune disease, cardiovascular health and infectious disease. As a result, availability and rapid analytical turnaround of 25(OH)D assays have had to improve. Today these demands are largely met in the clinical laboratory by direct automated chemiluminescent platform analysis or high-throughput LC/MS procedures. These methods are diverse and often do not agree with respect to designated reference ranges.
The assessment of circulating 25(OH)D levels has become an important clinical tool in the management and prevention of diverse disease states. For this reason, assay standardization as well as a uniform reference range for circulating 25(OH)D levels must be achieved.
在过去5年中,用于临床诊断的循环25-羟维生素D[25(OH)D]检测呈指数级增长。因此,及时回顾这种增长的原因以及为满足这一需求而使用的各种分析方法很有必要。
长期以来,由循环25(OH)D水平所定义的营养性维生素D状态一直与骨骼健康有关。然而,在过去十年中,循环25(OH)D在人类中与癌症发病率、自身免疫性疾病、心血管健康和传染病密切相关。因此,25(OH)D检测的可用性和快速分析周转时间必须得到改善。如今,临床实验室通过直接自动化化学发光平台分析或高通量液相色谱/质谱程序在很大程度上满足了这些需求。这些方法各不相同,在指定的参考范围方面往往也不一致。
循环25(OH)D水平的检测已成为管理和预防多种疾病状态的重要临床工具。因此,必须实现检测标准化以及循环25(OH)D水平的统一参考范围。